1. Home
  2. Vol 11, No 3 (2025)
  3. Zakaria

A Comparative Study of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry: Accuracy and Applications

Mohamed H. Zakaria, Hossam Fawzy, Mohammed El-Beshbeshy, Magda Farhan

Abstract


This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) and Digital Close-Range Photogrammetry (DCRP) against traditional Total Station (TS) methods for 3D spatial documentation across a range from 8.00 meters to 2.00 mm. The analysis was conducted through three scenarios: Ground Control Points (GCPs), the Kafrelsheikh University Mosque, and Kafr El Sheikh Tanta Road. Paired t-tests and ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) across all variables, with TLS demonstrating superior precision. TLS deviations in linear distance measurements were as low as 2 mm compared to TS, while DCRP exhibited variations ranging from 0.02 m to 0.30 m depending on surface reflectivity and distance. Pearson correlation coefficients exceeded 0.95 for TLS across all axes (X, Y, Z), highlighting its reliability. DCRP, while slightly less consistent, showed minor variability, particularly in the Z-axis. For road crack measurements, TLS captured lengths ranging from 180 mm to 750 mm (mean = 501.417 mm, SD = 207.341 mm), which aligned closely with DCRP results (mean = 504.867 mm, SD = 204.455 mm). The mosque’s complex geometry showcased TLS's higher precision (ANOVA F = 15.78, p = 0.0001 for the Y-axis), while DCRP provided faster data acquisition and reduced costs. Both methods demonstrated significant statistical alignment, though TLS consistently outperformed DCRP in accuracy, especially for intricate structures requiring high precision. The findings emphasize the complementary strengths of TLS and DCRP, recommending their integration to achieve an optimal balance of accuracy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. Future research should focus on improving the precision of DCRP for detailed architectural and structural documentation while exploring hybrid techniques to enhance the reliability and scalability of 3D surveying methods.

 

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-03-021

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS); Digital Close-Range Photogrammetry (DCRP); Surveying Accuracy; Ground Control Points (GCPs); 3D Measurement Techniques.

References


O’Driscoll, J. (2018). Landscape applications of photogrammetry using unmanned aerial vehicles. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 22, 32–44. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.09.010.

Galantucci, R. A., & Fatiguso, F. (2019). Advanced damage detection techniques in historical buildings using digital photogrammetry and 3D surface anlysis. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 36, 51–62. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2018.09.014.

Van Genderen, J. L. (2011). Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning. International Journal of Digital Earth, 4(2), 183–184. doi:10.1080/17538947.2011.553487.

El-Din Fawzy, H., Basha, A. M., & Botross, M. N. (2020). Estimating a mathematical formula of soil erosion under the effect of rainfall simulation by digital close range photogrammetry technique. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 59(6), 5079–5097. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.039.

El-Din Fawzy, H. (2019). 3D laser scanning and close-range photogrammetry for buildings documentation: A hybrid technique towards a better accuracy. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(4), 1191–1204. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2019.10.003.

El-Din Fawzy, H. (2019). Study the accuracy of digital close range photogrammetry technique software as a measuring tool. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1), 171–179. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2018.04.004.

Abd-Elmaaboud, A., El-Tokhey, M., Ragheb, A., & Mogahed, Y. (2019). Comparative assessment of terrestrial laser scanner against traditional surveying methods. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS), 6, 79-84.

Solomon, D. C. (2014). Surveying with GPS, total station and terrestrial laser scanner: a comparative study. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Master Thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Beraldin, J. A. (2004). Integration of laser scanning and close-range photogrammetry–The last decade and beyond. Proceedings of the XXth ISPRS Congress, 12-23 July, 2004, Istanbul, Turkey.

Velios, A., Harrison, J.P., (2001). Laser scanning and digital close range photogrammetry for capturing 3D archaeological objects: a comparison of quality and practicality. Archaeological Informatics: Pushing the Envelope, CAA 2001, Oxford, United States.

Brown, D.C. (1971) Close-Range Camera Calibration. Photogrammetric Engineering, 37, 855-866.

Alkan, R. M., & Karsidag, G. (2012). Analysis of the accuracy of terrestrial laser scanning measurements. FIG Working week, knowing to manage the territory, protect the environment, evaluate the cultural heritage, 6-10 May, 2012, Rome, Italy.

Brzeziński, K., Maślakowski, M., & Liszewski, P. (2018). Evaluation of the Volume Measurement Optical Method Suitability for Determining the Relative Compaction of Soils. Civil Engineering Journal, 4(9), 2052. doi:10.28991/cej-03091138.

Alqahtani, T. (2024). Assessing Geospatial Accuracy in Mapping Applications: A Focus on Google Earth. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 10(8), 2615–2630. doi:10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-08-012.

Gaong, G. E. A., Idris, A. N., Luh, L. C., Ab Rahman, A. A., Wan Mohamed Sabri, W. M. S., & Abdul Jalil, A. H. (2025). Comparative Evaluation of 3D Building Model Using UAV Photogrammetry and Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS). Built Environment Journal, 22(1), 1066. doi:10.24191/bej.v22i1.1066.

Salah, M., Farhan, M., Basha, A., & Sherif, M. (2024). Filtering of 3D point clouds using maximum likelihood algorithm. Discover Applied Sciences, 6(8), 419. doi:10.1007/s42452-024-05976-1.

Borkowski, A. S., & Kubrat, A. (2024). Integration of Laser Scanning, Digital Photogrammetry and BIM Technology: A Review and Case Studies. Eng, 5(4), 2395–2409. doi:10.3390/eng5040125.

Bori, M. M., & Hussein, Z. E. (2020). Integration the low cost camera images with the Google earth dataset to create a 3D model. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 6(3), 446–458. doi:10.28991/cej-2020-03091482.

Basha, A. M., Zakaria, M. H., El-Nimr, M. T., & Abo-Raya, M. M. (2024). Predicting the Maximum Axial Capacity of Secant Pile Walls Embedded in Sandy Soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 42(5), 3373–3400. doi:10.1007/s10706-023-02734-9.

PhotoModeler (2009). PhotoModeler UAS User’s Manual. Eos Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.

Hu, J., Liu, E., & Yu, J. (2021). Application of Structural Deformation Monitoring Based on Close-Range Photogrammetry Technology. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2021/6621440.

Detchev, I., Habib, A., & El-Badry, M. (2012). Estimation of Vertical Deflections in Concrete Beams through Digital Close Range Photogrammetry. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXVIII-5/W12, 219–224. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-xxxviii-5-w12-219-2011.

Li, J., Su, J., & Zeng, X. (2019). A solution method for image distortion correction model based on bilinear interpolation. Computer Optics, 43(1), 99–104. doi:10.18287/2412-6179-2019-43-1-99-104.

Ji, Y., & Wu, J. (2019). Calibration method of light-field camera for photogrammetry application. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 148, 148 106943. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.106943.

Pepe, M., & Costantino, D. (2020). Techniques, tools, platforms and algorithms in close range photogrammetry in building 3D model and 2D representation of objects and complex architectures. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 18(1), 42–65. doi:10.14733/cadaps.2021.42-65.

Maas, H. G., & Hampel, U. (2006). Programmetric techniques in civil engineering material testing and structure monitoring. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 72(1), 39–45. doi:10.14358/PERS.72.1.39.

Kim, H. G., & Yun, H. S. (2016). Shape deformation monitoring for VLBI antenna using close-range photogrammetry and total least squares. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, 34(1), 99–107. doi:10.7848/ksgpc.2016.34.1.99.

Luhmann, T., Robson, S., Kyle, S., & Boehm, J. (2023). Close-range photogrammetry and 3D imaging. Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

Salehi, B., & Jarahizadeh, S. (2022). Improving the UAV-Derived DSM by Introducing a Modified Ransac Algorithm. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLIII-B2-2022, 147–152. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b2-2022-147-2022.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-03-021

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2025 Mohamed Hamed Zakaria, Hossam Fawzy, Mohammed El-Beshbeshy, Magda Farhan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message