1. Home
  2. Vol 10, No 3 (2024)
  3. Kulbayev

Strength and Deformability of Structural Steel for Use in Construction

Begman Kulbayev, Vladimir Lapin, Alexandr Shakhnovich, Yeraly Shokbarov, Tursymbai Tuleyev, Serik Aldakhov, Yerken Aldakhov, Alimzhan Ali

Abstract


The purpose of the study is an experimental determination of the stress-related characteristics of the structural steel produced in the Republic of Kazakhstan for use in conventional and earthquake-resistive construction. Since 2015, the construction industry has been using European regulatory documents—Eurocodes—as a statutory framework. In particular, the Eurocode 1993 for steel structures and the Eurocode 1998 for the design of earthquake-resistant structures However, the study of stress-related properties of structural steel using experimental methods of ISO standards has not been performed. Therefore, in the construction industry of the Republic of Kazakhstan, steel-work structures have been used in fairly limited volume since 2015. The experimental studies were conducted on 7 types of structural steel with thicknesses of 8, 10, and 20 mm manufactured by Arcelor Mittal. The yield strength, ultimate tensile strength (breaking stress), and tensile strength at break were studied. The experimental studies were carried out on the basis of ISO standards. In each test run, 5 samples were used. In two series, 20 samples each were tested, which made it possible to estimate the yield strength and strength distribution functions. The correlation relationships between Brinell hardness and yield and strength limits have been studied. As a result of experimental studies, it was found that the strength and deformability parameters fully comply with the requirements of Eurocode 1993. Based on the application of the Student's test, it is revealed that the distribution functions of yield strength and resistance correspond to the normal law (Gaussian function). The calculation of a three-story, two-span residential building with box section columns for construction in an area with a seismicity of 8 points is performed by the finite element method. The work results will significantly increase the scope of Kazakhstani structural steel use in seismic and conventional areas of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

 

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-03-09

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Yield Strength; Tensile Strength; Steel Hardness; Construction Steel; Eurocode; Relative Rupture Strain.

References


Vedyakov, I., Odessky, P.D., Konin, D.V., Egorova, A.A. (2015). Steel for rolling I-beams with parallel faces of shelves in Industrial and civil construction (PGS), No. 6, 30-35.

Odessky, P. D., & Kulik, D. V. (2005). New Generation Steel in Unique Structures. Internet Engineering, 1-176. (In Russian).

Shan, S., & Mou, B. (2024). Development of an innovative module-to-core wall connection for steel-framed modular high-rise buildings. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 214, 108494. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.108494.

Gioncu, V., & Mazzolani, F. (2013). Seismic design of steel structures. CRC Press, London, United Kingdom. doi:10.1201/b16053.

Jin, J., Nagae, T., & Chung, Y. L. (2023). Seismic and collapse behavior of existing high-rise steel buildings under long-period earthquakes. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 211. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108151.

Grigorian, M., Sedighi, S., & Mohammadi, H. (2023). Plastic design of sustainable steel earthquake resistant structures. In Engineering Structures (Vol. 289). doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116178.

Gryniewicz, M., Roberts, M. J., & Davies, J. M. (2021). Testing and analysis of a full-scale steel-framed building including the consideration of structure-cladding interaction. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 181. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106611.

Baciu, F., Rusu-Casandra, A., & Pastramă, S. D. (2019). Low strain rate testing of tensile properties of steel. Materials Today: Proceedings, 32, 128–132. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.469.

Vaz-Romero, A., Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A., & Arias, A. (2015). The deterministic nature of the fracture location in the dynamic tensile testing of steel sheets. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 86, 318–335. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.08.005.

Wang, W., & Kodur, V. (2020). Tensile test on steels at elevated temperatures. Material Properties of Steel in Fire Conditions, 3, 43–120. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813302-6.00003-5.

Rout, M., & Murugabalaji, V. (2023). Tensile properties variation along the thickness direction of hot rolled austenitic stainless steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 865. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2023.144643.

Yang, X. J., & Lin, F. (2023). Experimental and analytical studies on tensile behavior of kinked steel plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 204. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.107874.

Gardnerand, L., & Nethrcott D. (2005). Designers’ Guide to Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. General rules and rules for buildings. Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE), London, United Kingdom.

EN 1993-1-12. (2007). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures –Part 1-12: Additional rules for the extension of EN 1993 up to steel grades s700. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

Kulbayev, B., Lapin, V., Tuleyev, T., Aldakhov, S., Aldakhov, Y., & Ali, A. (2023). Hardness specification of structural steel used in the Republic of Kazakhstan. E3S Web of Conferences, 389. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202338901002.

Kulbayev, B., Lapin, V., Shakhnovich, A., Tuleyev, T., Aldakhov, S., Aldakhov, Y., & Ali, A. (2023). Experimental Research of Impact Toughness of the Kazakhstani Construction Steel— Assessment of Compliance with the Provisions of 1993 Eurocode. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 13(04), 664–676. doi:10.4236/ojce.2023.134044.

Kulbayev, B., Lapin, V., Shakhnovich, A., Tuleyev, T., Aldakhov, S., Aldakhov, Y., & Ali, A. (2023). Weld Joint Efficiency of the Kazakhstani Constructional Steel. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 13(04), 802–813. doi:10.4236/ojce.2023.134052.

Vedyakov, I. I., Odesskiy, P. D., & Gurov, S. V. (2018). About regulation of materials in the new of rules SP 16.13330. Steel structures. Actualized edition of SNIP II-23-81. Industrial and civil construction, 8, 61-69.

Galperin, R. M., Nersesov, I. L., & Galperin, E. I. (1985). Seismic regime of Almaty for 1972–1982 years. Science, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).

Sadykova, A. B., Silacheva, N. V., & Stepanenko, N. P. (2021). Seismic micro zoning of the territory of Almaty on a new methodological basis. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Series of Geology and Technical Sciences, 1(445), 127–134. doi:10.32014/2021.2518-170X.18.

Kurskeev, A. K., Timush, A. V., Shatsilov, V. I., Sydykov, A., Gorbunov, P. N., & Sadykova, A. B. (2000). Seismic zoning of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Evero, Almaty, 219.

Lapin, V., Makish, N., Kassenov, K., Omarov, Z., & Kassenov, D. (2021). Instrumental records received in 11 storey steel frame building during a remote earthquake. E3S Web of Conferences, 258, 9078. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202125809078.

Vedyakov, I. I., Suslov, L. S., Marisiuk, A. A., Kashin, O. V, & Novozhilov, M. V. (2023). Bearing capacity of a steel frame of a multi-storey modular building with consideration of the rigidity of quick-assembled connections. Earthquake Engineering. Constructions Safety, 6, 8–44. doi:10.37153/2618-9283-2023-6-8-44.

Nemchinov, Yu. I. (2015). Seismic Resistance of High-Rise Buildings. NIISK, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Fang, C., Wang, W., Qiu, C., Hu, S., MacRae, G. A., & Eatherton, M. R. (2022). Seismic resilient steel structures: A review of research, practice, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 191, 107172. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107172.

Wasse, A. D., Dai, K., Wang, J., & Sharbati, R. (2024). State-of-the-Art Review: Seismic Design and Performance Assessment of Special Concentrically Braced Frames Developed for Complex Industrial Building Structures. International Journal of Steel Structures, 1-16. doi:10.1007/s13296-024-00815-w.

Pawar, G. D., & Dawari, V. B. (2023). Seismic design of bolted beam to column connections in tubular steel structures – A review. Materials Today: Proceedings, 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.150.

Pu, W., & He, C. (2022). Seismic design framework for steel structures with hysteretic and viscous dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 194, 107330. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107330.

Ras, A., & Boumechra, N. (2016). Seismic energy dissipation study of linear fluid viscous dampers in steel structure design. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(3), 2821–2832. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2016.07.012.

Mahjoubi, S., & Maleki, S. (2016). Seismic performance evaluation and design of steel structures equipped with dual-pipe dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 122, 25–39. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.01.023.

Gholizadeh, S., & Salajegheh, E. (2010). Optimal seismic design of steel structures by an efficient soft computing based algorithm. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(1), 85–95. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.07.006.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-03-09

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Vladimir Lapin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message