Optimizing Time Performance in implementing Green Retrofitting on High-Rise Residential by using System Dynamics and M-PERT

Albert E. Husin, Riza S. Prawina, Priyawan Priyawan, Rizkiawan Pangestu, Bernadette D. Kussumardianadewi, Lastarida Sinaga, Kristiyanto Kristiyanto

Abstract


Climate change is a threat and crisis that is engulfing the world today; therefore, the target of Net Zero Emission (NZE) by 2060 should be an obligation for all countries. The greenhouse effect, global warming, destruction of the ozone layer, forest destruction, uncontrolled use of CFCs, and industrial exhaust are factors that cause climate change. The consequences of climate change are dire, resulting in drought, water scarcity, land fires, rising sea levels, flash floods, melting polar ice caps, storms, and a decline in biodiversity. Green buildings (GB) are important in saving energy, water, and other resources by meeting technical construction standards and applying green building principles according to their function and classification at each stage of their implementation. Buildings with measurable performance. Expected to reduce carbon or greenhouse gas emissions. The latest Technical Guidelines for Green Building Performance Assessment Standards were developed through regulations from the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing (PUPR) No.1 of 2022. The way to improve and find a solution to achieve a Green Building according to these regulations is by applying solar modules as an alternative energy source in the building under study, providing significant added value to the assessment process. This research aims to analyze whether the renewable energy source factor is an influencing factor in the application of the Ministry of PUPR Green Building in High-Rise Residential. This research framework is at least initiated from matters where M-PERT, which is an innovation and the latest method of continuation of the PERT method, is proven to be able to provide an accuracy of planning execution time of 99% or with an error rate of 1%. From the research results with the application of M-PERT, it is proven that it can provide an accuracy of implementation time of 98.93% in the Primary Rating, while in the Intermediate Rating, it can provide an accuracy of implementation time of 99.92% and 98.88% accuracy of implementation time for the Main Rating category.

 

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-12-07

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Green Building; SEM-PLS; System Dynamics; M-PERT; High-rise Residential; Time Accuracy.

References


Tong, Z., Chen, Y., Malkawi, A., Liu, Z., & Freeman, R. B. (2016). Energy saving potential of natural ventilation in China: The impact of ambient air pollution. Applied Energy, 179, 660–668. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.019.

Liang, X., Shen, G. Q., & Guo, L. (2015). Improving management of green retrofits from a stakeholder perspective: A case study in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(11), 13823–13842. doi:10.3390/ijerph121113823.

Berardi, U. (2013). Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery. Intelligent Buildings International, 5(1), 65–66. doi:10.1080/17508975.2012.756388.

Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States.

van der Heijden, M. G. A., Martin, F. M., Selosse, M. A., & Sanders, I. R. (2015). Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: The past, the present, and the future. New Phytologist, 205(4), 1406–1423. doi:10.1111/nph.13288.

Rizvi, S., Jungwoo Ryoo, Yuhong Liu, Zazworsky, D., & Cappeta, A. (2014). A centralized trust model approach for cloud computing. 2014 23rd Wireless and Optical Communication Conference (WOCC), IEEE Publication, New Jersey, United States. doi:10.1109/wocc.2014.6839923.

Turner, C., Frankel, M., & Council, U. G. B. (2008). Energy performance of LEED for new construction buildings. New Buildings Institute, 4(4), 1-42, Vancouver, Canada.

Newsham, G. R., Mancini, S., & Birt, B. J. (2009). Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but...Energy and Buildings, 41(8), 897–905. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.03.014.

Scofield, J. H. (2013). Efficacy of LEED certification in reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for large New York City office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 67, 517–524. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.032.

Iwano, E. R. M., Tjakra, J., & Pratasis, P. A. K. (2016). Application of the CPM Method in Construction Projects (Case Study of the Construction of a New Building at the Eben Haezar Manado Complex. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 4(9), 551-558. (In Indonesian).

Pearce, D. (2003). The social cost of carbon and its policy implications. Oxford review of economic policy, 19(3), 362-384. doi:10.1093/oxrep/19.3.362.

United Nations Environment Programme (2020). 2020 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Nairobi, Kenya.

Robati, M., Oldfield, P., Nezhad, A. A., Carmichael, D. G., & Kuru, A. (2021). Carbon value engineering: A framework for integrating embodied carbon and cost reduction strategies in building design. Building and Environment, 192(October 2020), 107620. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107620.

Khatib, H. (2012). IEA World Energy Outlook 2011-A comment. Energy Policy, 48, 737–743. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.007.

IEA. (2021). World Energy Outlook 2021 – Analysis. International Energy Agency, Paris, France. Available online; https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2021 (accessed on June 2023).

Sutikno, S., Husin, A. E., & Yuliati, M. M. E. (2022). Using PLS-SEM to analyze the criteria for the optimum cost of green MICE projects in Indonesia based on value engineering and lifecycle cost analysis. Archives of Civil Engineering, LXVIII(4), 555 –570. doi:10.24425/ace.2022.143054.

Nguyen, H. D., & Macchion, L. (2023). Risk management in green building: a review of the current state of research and future directions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(3), 2136-2172. doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02168-y.

Kholil, M., Nurul Alfa, B., & Hariadi, M. (2018). Scheduling of House Development Projects with CPM and PERT Method for Time Efficiency (Case Study: House Type 36). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 140(1), 1-9. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012010.

Abbasi, G. Y., & Mukattash, A. M. (2001). Crashing PERT networks using mathematical programming. International Journal of Project Management, 19(3), 181–188. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00061-7.

Ballesteros-Pérez, P. (2017). M-PERT: Manual Project-Duration Estimation Technique for Teaching Scheduling Basics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(9), 04017063. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001358.

Ministry of Public Works and Housing (2023). PUPR No.1 the Year 2022, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available online: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/216825/permen-pupr-no-1-tahun-2022 (accessed on April 2023). (In Indonesian).

Khfagy, M., AbdelSatar, Y., Reyad, O., & Omran, N. (2016, October). An integrated smoothing method for fingerprint recognition enhancement. In International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, 407-416. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. Doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48308-5_39.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. doi:10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.

Kiraz, A., Canpolat, O., Özkurt, C., & Taşkın, H. (2020). Analysis of the factors affecting the Industry 4.0 tendency with the structural equation model and an application. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 150, 106911. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106911.

Tukadi, Widodo, W., Ruswiensari, M., & Qomar, A. (2019). Realtime Monitoring of Electric Power Usage Based on the Internet of Things. Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Teknologi Terapan VII 2019, 581–586. (In Indonesian).

Oti, A. H., Kurul, E., Cheung, F., & Tah, J. H. M. (2016). A framework for the utilization of Building Management System data in building information models for building design and operation. Automation in Construction, 72, 195–210. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.043.

Hillier, F.S., Lieberman, G.J. (2009) Introduction to Operations Research (9th Ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York United States.

van Dorp, J. R. (2012). Indirect parameter elicitation procedures for some distributions with bounded support - with applications in Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT). Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(4), 393–401. doi:10.1080/15732479.2011.563099.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-12-07

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Albert Eddy Husin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message