The Analysis of Sustainable Construction Strategies on the Likupang Special Economic Zone (SEZ)

R. Arifuddin, R. U. Latief, S. Hamzah, D. Pangemanan, E. Aprianti, R. Fadlillah

Abstract


Many challenges are faced in implementing sustainable construction in Indonesia. This research aims to find an effective method for adopting sustainable construction. The method used combines qualitative and quantitative methods by incorporating the identification of significant factors affecting the adoption of sustainable construction. In data collection with the SWOT system, FGDs and interviews provided accurate information regarding factors and strategies to promote sustainable construction, particularly in the Likupang SEZ Project. From the results of the study, the IFSC value for the promotion strategy of sustainable construction in the Likupang SEZ project is the social factor of 0.2, followed by the economic factor of 0.3, the environmental factor of 1.2, and the government support factor, business investment, and cultural factors of 1.4, respectively. The highest IFSC value was obtained for the human resource factor of 1.6. Thus, it can be concluded that human resources must be accompanied by government support along with business investment and cultural influences in order to realize adequate sustainable development projections for the Likupang SEZ project in the future.

 

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-SP2023-09-07

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Likupang SEZ; Strategy; Sustainable Construction; SWOT Analysis.

References


Xiao, Y., Ma, D., Zhang, F., Zhao, N., Wang, L., Guo, Z., ... & Xiao, Y. (2023). Spatiotemporal differentiation of carbon emission efficiency and influencing factors: From the perspective of 136 countries. Science of the Total Environment, 879, 163032. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163032.

Isang, I. W., & Ebiloma, D. O. (2023). Challenges and strategies for sustainable project performance in the post-Covid era in Nigeria: a thematic analysis approach. Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment, 3(1), 32–47. doi:10.1108/febe-06-2022-0025.

Negash, Y. T., Hassan, A. M., Tseng, M. L., Wu, K. J., & Ali, M. H. (2021). Sustainable construction and demolition waste management in Somaliland: Regulatory barriers lead to technical and environmental barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126717. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126717.

Hamzah, S., Pangemanan, D., & Aprianti, E. (2023). The Environmental and Sustainable Factors on the Special Economic Zones Development. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 9(2), 334–342. doi:10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-02-06.

Plessis, C. Du. (2007). A strategic framework for sustainable construction in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics, 25(1), 67–76. doi:10.1080/01446190600601313.

Díaz-López, C., Navarro-Galera, A., Zamorano, M., & Buendía-Carrillo, D. (2021). Identifying public policies to promote sustainable building: A proposal for governmental drivers based on stakeholder perceptions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14), 7701. doi:10.3390/su13147701.

Pangemanan, D., Latief, R. U., Arifuddin, R., & Hamzah, S. (2023). Literature Review and Conceptual Framework: Sustainability Construction of Implementation in Development of Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Likupang. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1134(1), 012051. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1134/1/012051.

Sanggoro, H. B., Alisjahbana, S. W., & Mohamad, D. (2022). Influence of Project and Affected Local Community Interests Level on Social Conflicts in Indonesian Infrastructure Projects. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics, 35(7), 1217–1226. doi:10.5829/ije.2022.35.07a.01.

Mousavi, S. E. (2016). Performance of Non-fired Green Brick Containing Rice Husk as Sustainable Building Material. International Journal of Engineering, 29(3), 306–312. doi:10.5829/idosi.ije.2016.29.03c.04.

Pangemanan, D., Usman Latief, R., Hamzah, S., & Arifuddin, R. (2023). Study on the Application of Sustainable Construction in the Development of the Likupang Special Economic Zone. International Journal of Engineering Transactions C: Aspects, 36(1), 50–59. doi:10.5829/ije.2023.36.01a.07.

Akhanova, Nadeem, Kim, & Azhar. (2019). A Framework of Building Sustainability Assessment System for the Commercial Buildings in Kazakhstan. Sustainability, 11(17), 4754. doi:10.3390/su11174754.

Zea Escamilla, E., Habert, G., & Wohlmuth, E. (2016). When CO2 counts: Sustainability assessment of industrialized bamboo as an alternative for social housing programs in the Philippines. Building and Environment, 103, 44–53. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.003.

Lima, L., Trindade, E., Alencar, L., Alencar, M., & Silva, L. (2021). Sustainability in the construction industry: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125730.

Durdyev, S., Ismail, S., Ihtiyar, A., Abu Bakar, N. F. S., & Darko, A. (2018). A partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) of barriers to sustainable construction in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 564–572. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.304.

Willar, D., Waney, E. V. Y., Pangemanan, D. D. G., & Mait, R. E. G. (2021). Sustainable construction practices in the execution of infrastructure projects: The extent of implementation. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 10(1), 106–124. doi:10.1108/SASBE-07-2019-0086.

Fitriani, H., & Ajayi, S. (2022). Barriers to sustainable practices in the Indonesian construction industry. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–23. doi:10.1080/09640568.2022.2057281.

Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States.

Nahman, A., Wise, R., & De Lange, W. (2009). Environmental and resource economies in South Africa: Status quo and lessons for developing countries. South African Journal of Science, 105(9–10), 350–355. doi:10.4102/sajs.v105i9/10.108.

Jamil, A. H. A., & Fathi, M. S. (2016). The Integration of Lean Construction and Sustainable Construction: A Stakeholder Perspective in Analyzing Sustainable Lean Construction Strategies in Malaysia. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 634–643. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.205.

Dosumu, O. S., & Aigbavboa, C. O. (2021). Drivers and effects of sustainable construction in the South African construction industry. Acta Structilia, 28(2), 78–107. doi:10.18820/24150487/as28i2.4.

Ashworth, A., & Perera, S. (2018). Contractual Procedures in the Construction Industry. Routledge, London, United Kingdom. doi:10.1201/9781315529059.

Zulu, S. L., Zulu, E., Chabala, M., & Chunda, N. (2022). Drivers and barriers to sustainability practices in the Zambian Construction Industry. International Journal of Construction Management. doi:10.1080/15623599.2022.2045425.

Okoye, P. U. (2021). Factors influencing clients’ commitment to sustainable construction practices. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(1), 39–48. doi:10.18280/ijsdp.160104.

Belussi, L., Barozzi, B., Bellazzi, A., Danza, L., Devitofrancesco, A., Fanciulli, C., Ghellere, M., Guazzi, G., Meroni, I., Salamone, F., Scamoni, F., & Scrosati, C. (2019). A review of performance of zero energy buildings and energy efficiency solutions. Journal of Building Engineering, 25, 100772. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100772.

Ismail, F. Z., Halog, A., & Smith, C. (2017). How sustainable is disaster resilience? An overview of sustainable construction approach in post-disaster housing reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(5), 555–572. doi:10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2016-0028.

Fatourehchi, D., & Zarghami, E. (2020). Social sustainability assessment framework for managing sustainable construction in residential buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 32. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101761.

Hapsari, M., Putri, W., & Sarju. (2022). Challenges and Chances of Sustainable Construction in Indonesia: Policy Insights. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1111(1), 012085. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1111/1/012085.

Sourn, S., Limsawasd, C., Khun-Anod, K., & Athigakunagorn, N. (2022). Barriers to Green Implementation in Highway Construction in Cambodia: Identification of Root Causes. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(3), 715–725. doi:10.18280/ijsdp.170302.

Endo, K., Edelenbos, J., & Gianoli, A. (2022). Sustainable Infrastructure: A Systematic Literature Review on Finance Arrangements and Governance Modes. Public Works Management & Policy. doi:10.1177/1087724x221130284.

Aghimien, D.O., Aigbavboa, C., Oke, A. E., & Musenga, C., (2018). Barriers to sustainable construction practices in the Zambian construction industry. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 26-27 July, 2018, Paris, France.

Ajibike, W. A., Adeleke, A. Q., Mohamad, F., Bamgbade, J. A., Nawi, M. N. M., & Moshood, T. D. (2021). An evaluation of environmental sustainability performance via attitudes, social responsibility, and culture: A mediated analysis. Environmental Challenges, 4. doi:10.1016/j.envc.2021.100161.

Solaimani, S., & Sedighi, M. (2020). Toward a holistic view on lean sustainable construction: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119213.

Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M., Erkan, I., & Rahman, M. (2021). SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), 55–73. doi:10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148.

Bayhan, H. G., & Karaca, E. (2019). SWOT Analysis of Biomimicry for Sustainable Buildings – A Literature Review of the Importance of Kinetic Architecture Applications in Sustainable Construction Projects. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471, 082047. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/471/8/082047.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-SP2023-09-07

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Rosmariani Arifuddin, Rusdi Usman Latif, Daisy Pangemanan, Suharman Hamzah, Evi Aprianti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message