Deformation Characteristics of Sand Geofoam Blocks using Large-Scale Oedometer Apparatus

Reza Jamshidi Chenari, Alireza Firoozfar, Shekofeh Attari, Ardavan Izadi, Seyed Ebrahim Shafiei

Abstract


As a lightweight fill material, expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam block has been successfully utilized in geotechnical applications due to its low density and high compressive strength. Understanding the modulus of elasticity and compressibility coefficient of sand-EPS is an aspect that has not been fully understood which may have a significant effect on the design and construction of geotechnical structures. In this study, an attempt has been made to understand the behavior of deformation characteristic parameters of sand-geofoam block combinations with different patterns, using a newly designed and fabricated large-scale oedometer apparatus. The influence of both different combinations of sand-EPS geofoam and relative densities of soil, on the stress-strain behavior and coefficient of volume compressibility under controlled conditions, are experimentally studied. Specimens of EPS geofoam with a density of 8 kg/m3 were tested in relative densities of 35% and 70% of sand under six different overburden pressures of 50 kPa, 100 kPa, 150 kPa, 200 kPa, 250 kPa, and 300 kPa. From the experimental results, it is observed that the settlement and volume compressibility coefficient substantially increased, as the thickness of EPS geofoam increases. Furthermore, utilization of thinner EPS layers with the constant volume fraction ratio of EPS led to the greater settlement.


Keywords


Geofoam Block; Large-Scale Oedometer; Volume Compressibility Coefficient; Stress-Strain Behavior.

References


Elragi, A. F., “Selected engineering properties and applications of EPS geofoamâ€, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (2000).

Mandal, J.N. and Nimbalkar, S.S., “Reduction of lateral earth pressure by compressible inclusion by centrifuge modelingâ€, In Proceeding of Indian Geotechnical Conference, (1999): 63-67.

Farnsworth, C. B., Bartlett, S. F., Negussey, D., and Stuedlein, A. W., “Rapid construction and settlement behavior of embankment systems on soft foundation soilsâ€, Journal of geotechnical and geo-environmental engineering, 134(3), (2008): 289-301.

Jutkofsky, W., Sung, J. and Negussey, D., “Stabilization of embankment slope with geofoamâ€, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1736, (2000):94-102.

Horvath, J.S., “Using geosynthetics to reduce earth loads on rigid retaining structuresâ€, In Geosynthetics, Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, (1991).

Horvath, J.S., “The compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoamâ€, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 15(3), (1997): 77-120.

Horvath, J.S., “Geofoam compressible inclusions: the new frontier in earth retaining structuresâ€, In Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Projects, (2004): 1925-1934.

Mandal, J.N. and Nimbalkar, S.S., “Centrifuge tests for bearing capacity of EPS on soft soilsâ€, Foundation Problems and Case Studies, 1st IGS Indore Chapter, (2000): 60-74.

Bathurst, R.J., Zarnani, S. and Gaskin, A., “Shaking table testing of geofoam seismic buffersâ€, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27(4), (2007): 324-332.

Hatami, K. and Witthoeft, A.F., “A numerical study on the use of geofoam to increase the external stability of reinforced soil wallsâ€, Geosynthetics International, 15(6), (2008): 452-470.

Zarnani, S. and Bathurst, R.J., “Numerical modeling of EPS seismic buffer shaking table testsâ€, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 26(5), (2008): 371-383.

Zarnani, S. and Bathurst, R.J., “Influence of constitutive model on numerical simulation of EPS seismic buffer shaking table testsâ€, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(4), (2009): 308-312.

DuÅ¡kov, M., “Materials research on EPS20 and EPS15 under representative conditions in pavement structuresâ€, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 15(1), (1997): 147-181.

DuÅ¡kov, M. and Scarpas, A., “Three-dimensional finite element analysis of flexible pavements with an (open joint in the) EPS sub-baseâ€, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 15(1), (1997): 29-38.

Stark, T.D., Arellano, D., Horvath, J.S. and Leshchinsky, D., “Geofoam applications in the design and construction of highway embankmentsâ€, No. NCHRP Project 24-11, (2004).

Huang, X. and Negussey, D., “EPS Geofoam Design Parameters for Pavement Structuresâ€, In Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, (2011): 4544-4554.

Ossa, A. and Romo, M.P., “Dynamic characterization of EPS geofoamâ€, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29(1), (2011): 40-50.

Deng, A., “The influence of different soils properties on stabilization behavior of reinforced soilâ€, Soil Engineering & Foundation, 15 (2), (2001): 31-34.

Negussey, D. and Jahanandish, M., “Comparison of some engineering properties of expanded polystyrene with those of soilsâ€, Transportation Research Record, 1418, (1993): 43-50.

Ikizler, S.B., Aytekin, M. and Nas, E., (2008), “Laboratory study of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam used with expansive soilsâ€, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 26(2), (2008):189-195.

Hazarika, H., “Stress–strain modeling of EPS geofoam for large strain applicationsâ€, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24(2), (2006): 79-90.

Padade, A. H., and Mandal, J., “Behavior of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam under triaxial loading conditionsâ€, Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, (17), (2012): 2542-2553.

Ertugrul, O.L. and Trandafir, A.C., “Lateral earth pressures on flexible cantilever retaining walls with deformable geofoam inclusionsâ€, Engineering Geology, 158, (2013): 23-33.

Karimpour Fard, M., Jamshid Chenari, R., and Soheili, F., “Shear strength characteristics of sand mixed with EPS beads using large direct shear apparatus†Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 20(8), (2015): 2205-2220.

ASTM D854, (2014), “Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometerâ€, ASTM International, West Conshohocken.

ASTM D 4253, (2006), “Standard Test Methods for Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Tableâ€, ASTM International, West Conshohocken.

ASTM D422-63, (2007), “Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soilsâ€, ASTM International, West Conshohocken.

Rowe, P.W. and Barden, L., “A new consolidation cellâ€, Geotechnique, 16(2), (1966): 162-170.

Jamshid Chenari, R., Karimpour Fard, M., Maghfarati, S.P., Pishgar, F. and Machado, S.L., (2016), “An investigation on the geotechnical properties of sand–EPS mixture using large oedometer apparatusâ€, Construction and Building Materials, 113, (2016): 773-782.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/cej-2017-00000114

Refbacks





Copyright (c) 2017 Reza Jamshidi Chenari, Alireza Firoozfar, Shekofeh Attari, Ardavan Izadi, Seyed Ebrahim Shafiei

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message