Effect of Infills on the Response Modification Factor for Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings

Dina Hesham Helmy; Hussein Okail; Mostafa Zidan

doi:10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-12-09

Authors

Dina Hesham Helmy
dina.hesham@fue.edu.eg
Structural Engineering and Construction Management Department, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Future University in Egypt,, Egypt
Hussein Okail Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Ain Shams University, Cairo,, Egypt
Mostafa Zidan Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Ain shams University, Cairo,, Egypt

Vol. 9 No. 12 (2023): December

Research Articles

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

RC frames with unreinforced masonry infill walls are the most common type of building. Unreinforced masonry walls are often not considered by engineers in the design process, although walls and frames interact during strong ground motion, leading to structural responses deviating radically from what is expected in the design. Under lateral load, reinforced concrete confining members (frames) act in tension or compression, depending on the direction of the lateral seismic pressures. Meanwhile, masonry walls act as diagonal struts prone to compression. This research aims to develop the effect of masonry infills and their distribution on the value of the resulting response modification factor. For this purpose, a parametric study was performed on five, seven, and ten-story' buildings modeled as bare and infilled frames. Infill ratio, panel aspect ratio, unidirectional eccentricity, and bidirectional eccentricities were the parameters investigated. Each proposed model's resulting response modification factor was compared to the value cited in different international codes. It was concluded that this value differs depending on several parameters and cannot be constant for a certain structural system. The novelty of this research is the deduction of a general equation to calculate the response modification factor as a function of the percentage of infills and the eccentricity, while presenting two different methods to calculate it.

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-12-09

Full Text: PDF

Helmy, D. H., Okail, H., & Zidan, M. (2023). Effect of Infills on the Response Modification Factor for Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings. Civil Engineering Journal, 9(12), 3092–3107. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-12-09

Download Citation

[1] Shing, P. B., & Mehrabi, A. B. (2002). Behaviour and analysis of masonry-infilled frames. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 4(3), 320–331. doi:10.1002/pse.122.
[2] Ahmed, A., Ali, A., Khalid, H., & Ahmad, M. (2018). Role of masonry infill wall on the seismic behavior of typical four-storey building in Pakistan. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 414, 012017. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/414/1/012017.
[3] Silva, L. M., Vasconcelos, G., & Lourenço, P. B. (2021). Innovative systems for earthquake-resistant masonry infill walls: Characterization of materials and masonry assemblages. Journal of Building Engineering, 39, 102195. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102195.
[4] Elhegazy, H., Ebid, A., Mahdi, I. M., Haggag, S. Y. A., & Rashid, I. A. (2021). Decision Making and Predicting the Cost for the Optimal Structural System of Multi-Story Buildings. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(2), 152–161. doi:10.3844/ajeassp.2021.152.161.
[5] Elhegazy, H., Ebid, A., AboulHaggag, S., Mahdi, I., & AbdelRashid, I. (2023). Cost optimization of multi-story steel buildings during the conceptual design stage. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 8(1), 36. doi:10.1007/s41062-022-00999-2.
[6] Murty, C. V. R., & Jain, S. K. (2000). Beneficial influence of masonry infill walls on seismic performance of RC frame buildings. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 30 January-4 February, Auckland, New Zealand.
[7] Falcí£o Moreira, R., Varum, H., & Castro, J. M. (2023). Influence of Masonry Infill Walls on the Seismic Assessment of Non-Seismically Designed RC Framed Structures. Buildings, 13(5), 1148. doi:10.3390/buildings13051148.
[8] Kauffman, A., & Memari, A. M. (2014). Performance evaluation of different masonry infill walls with structural fuse elements based on in-plane cyclic load testing. Buildings, 4(4), 605–634. doi:10.3390/buildings4040605.
[9] Tamboli, H., & Karadi, U. (2012). Seismic Analysis of RC Frame Structure with and without Masonry Infill Walls. Indian Journal of Natural Sciences, 3(14), 1137–1148.
[10] Dias-Oliveira, J., Rodrigues, H., Asteris, P. G., & Varum, H. (2022). On the Seismic Behavior of Masonry Infilled Frame Structures. Buildings, 12(8), 1146. doi:10.3390/buildings12081146.
[11] Tawfik Essa, A. S. A., Kotp Badr, M. R., & El-Zanaty, A. H. (2014). Effect of infill wall on the ductility and behavior of high strength reinforced concrete frames. HBRC Journal, 10(3), 258–264. doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.12.005.
[12] Furtado, A., Vila-Pouca, N., Varum, H., & Aríªde, A. (2019). Study of the seismic response on the infill masonry walls of a 15-storey reinforced concrete structure in Nepal. Buildings, 9(2), 39. doi:10.3390/buildings9020039.
[13] Mohamed, W. A. E.-W. (2012). Parametric Study on the Effect of Masonry Infill Walls on the Seismic Resistance of RC Buildings. JES: Journal of Engineering Sciences, 40(3), 701–721. doi:10.21608/jesaun.2012.114405.
[14] Balun, B. (2023). The influence of ground motion duration on the energy based assessment of buildings with infill walls. Structures, 49, 765–778. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.011.
[15] Hareen, C. H. B. V., & Mohan, S. C. (2021). Evaluation of seismic torsional response of ductile RC buildings with soft first story. Structures, 29, 1640–1654. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.031.
[16] Qian, K., Lan, D. Q., Li, S. K., & Fu, F. (2021). Effects of infill walls on load resistance of multi-story RC frames to mitigate progressive collapse. Structures, 33, 2534–2545. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.015.
[17] Uprety, R., & Suwal, R. (2023). Bidirectional effect of earthquake on low-rise RC frames with and without the consideration of In-plane effect of unreinforced masonry infill. Structures, 47, 648–664. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.099.
[18] Lata, A., Xun, G., Ruofan, L., Xiaoyao, D., & Bideng, L. (2022). Experimental study on the seismic performance of RC frames considering the cast sequence of infilled walls and columns. Structures, 44, 186–199. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.006.
[19] Baniahmadi, M., Vafaei, M., & C Alih, S. (2022). Cyclic response of reinforced concrete frames partially infilled with relatively weak masonry wall. Journal of Building Engineering, 46, 103722. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103722.
[20] Papasotiriou, A., Athanatopoulou, A., & Kostinakis, K. (2021). Parametric study of the masonry infills' effect on the seismic performance of R/C frames based on the use of different damage measures. Engineering Structures, 241, 112326. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112326.
[21] Lyu, H., Deng, M., Han, Y., Ma, F., & Zhang, Y. (2022). In-plane cyclic testing of full-scale reinforced concrete frames with innovative isolated infill walls strengthened by highly ductile concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 57, 104934. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104934.
[22] Elhegazy, H., Ebid, A., Mahdi, I., Haggag, S., & Abdul-Rashied, I. (2021). Implementing QFD in decision making for selecting the optimal structural system for buildings. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 345–360. doi:10.1108/CI-12-2019-0149.
[23] Elhegazy, H., Ebid, A. M., Mahdi, I. M., Aboul Haggag, S. Y., & Rashid, I. A. (2020). Selecting optimum structural system for R.C. multi-story buildings considering direct cost. Structures, 24, 296–303. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.039.
[24] Pradhan, B., Zizzo, M., Sarhosis, V., & Cavaleri, L. (2021, October). Out-of-plane behaviour of unreinforced masonry infill walls: Review of the experimental studies and analysis of the influencing parameters. Structures, 33, 4387-4406. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.038.
[25] Kong, J., Su, Y., Zheng, Z., Wang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022). The Influence of Vertical Arrangement and Masonry Material of Infill Walls on the Seismic Performance of RC Frames. Buildings, 12(6), 825. doi:10.3390/buildings12060825.
[26] FEMA P-695. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors: Component Equivalency Methodology. Federal Emergency management Agency (FEMA), Washington, United States.
[27] Fazileh, F., Khosravi, S., Dolati, A., Fathi-Fazl, R., & Saatcioglu, M. (2022). Seismic performance assessment of conventional construction concrete moment-resisting frame buildings in Canada using the FEMA P695 methodology. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 49(9), 1508–1517. doi:10.1139/cjce-2021-0603.
[28] Fischer, A. W., & Schafer, B. W. (2023). Wall-diaphragm interactions in seismic response of building systems ii: Inelastic response and design. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 52(5), 1557–1577. doi:10.1002/eqe.3829.
[29] Gul, A., Alam, B., & Shahzada, K. (2022). Seismic performance evaluation of unconfined dry stacked block masonry structure. Engineering Structures, 265, 114529. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114529.
[30] Nasr, N. E., Fayed, M. N., Hussien, G., & El-Makhlasawi, A. M. (2022). The Effect of Shear Wall Openings on the Response Reduction Factor. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 8(4), 796–822. doi:10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-04-013.
[31] Ehteshami Moeini, M., Razavi, S. A., Yekrangnia, M., Pourasgari, P., & Abbasian, N. (2022). Cyclic performance assessment of damaged unreinforced masonry walls repaired with steel mesh reinforced shotcrete. Engineering Structures, 253, 113747. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113747.
[32] Ricci, P., Di Domenico, M., & Verderame, G. M. (2019). Nonlinear Dynamic Assessment of the Out-Of-Plane Response and Behaviour Factor of Unreinforced Masonry Infills in Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2015), 2104-2115. doi:10.7712/120119.7062.19693.
[33] Ali, Q., Ahmad, N., Ashraf, M., & Schacher, T. (2022). Seismic Performance Evaluation of Two-story Dhajji-dewari Traditional Structure. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 16(8), 1233–1251. doi:10.1080/15583058.2021.1875081.
[34] Liberatore, L., & AlShawa, O. (2021). On the application of the yield-line method to masonry infills subjected to combined in-plane and out-of-plane loads. Structures, 32, 1287–1301. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.044.
[35] Shedid, M. T., El-Dakhakhni, W. W., & Drysdale, R. G. (2011). Seismic Response Modification Factors for Reinforced Masonry Structural Walls. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 25(2), 74–86. doi:10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000144.
[36] Park, R. (1989). Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 22(3), 155–166. doi:10.5459/bnzsee.22.3.155-166.
[37] Asteris, P. G. (2008). Finite Element Micro-Modeling of Infilled Frames. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 8, 1–11. doi:10.56748/ejse.894.
[38] Helmy, D. H. M., Okail, H., & Zidan, M. (2017). Evaluation of the Seismic Response Parameters for Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 14(01), 28–41. doi:10.9790/1684-1401032841.
[39] Cavaleri, L., & Di Trapani, F. (2014). Cyclic response of masonry infilled RC frames: Experimental results and simplified modeling. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 65, 224–242. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.016.
[40] Caliò, I., & Pantò, B. (2014). A macro-element modelling approach of Infilled Frame Structures. Computers and Structures, 143, 91–107. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.07.008.
[41] Powell, G. H. (2008). Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures. Earthquake Spectra, 24(2), 555–557. doi:10.1193/1.2932170.
[42] Hosseinzadeh, S., & Galal, K. (2020). Seismic Fragility Assessment and Resilience of Reinforced Masonry Flanged Wall Systems. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 34(1). doi:10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001383.
[43] Kakaletsis, D.J. (2012). Rotations of RC Members of Infilled Frames at Yielding and Ultimate. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 6(1), 50–62. doi:10.2174/1874836801206010050.
[44] ECP-201. (2012) Egyptian Code of Practice for Calculation of Loads and Forces in Structures and Buildings. National Housing and Building Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
[45] UBC-97. (1997). Structural Engineering Design Provisions. International Conference of Building Officials, Uniform Building Code, Whittier, United States.
[46] ASCE/SEI 7-22. (2022). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, United States.
[47] SBC 301-CR-18. (2018). Saudi Building Code Structural requirements for Loads and Forces. Saudi Building Code National Committee, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Publication Start Year:	2015
JCR 2024 Impact Factor (IF):	4.9
JIF QUARTILE:	Q1
SJR 2024 Quartile:	Q1
Acceptance Rate:	27%
Review Speed (Average):	81 days
Issue Per Year:	12
Number of Volumes:	11
Number of Issues:	119
Number of Articles:	1816
Number of Reviewers:	3624
Number of Contributors:	6178
Contributing Countries:	91
No. of WoS Citations:	7986
Scopus CiteScore:	6.5
No. of Google Citations:	24065
Google h-index:	56
Google i10-index:	804
Abstract Views:	11,481,612
PDF Download:	5,908,793

Effect of Infills on the Response Modification Factor for Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings

Authors

Downloads

Downloads

Login

Publisher and Affiliated Societies

Publisher

Society Collaborations

Indexing & Abstracting

SidebarMenu

Journal Imprint

Journal Imprint

Journal Metrics

Follow us

Follow Us

Most Cited Articles

Heavy Metal Removal Investigation in Conventional Activated Sludge Systems

Modeling of the Solar Thermal Energy Use in Urban Areas

Adsorption Behavior of Heavy Metal Ions by Hybrid Inulin-TEOS for Water Treatment

Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review

visitors

Analytics

Information

Address

Contact Info: