Investigating the Impact of Changing the Usage Type of Existing Structure Using BIM

Heba Mustafa Mahmoud, Aly Abdel Fayad, Ayman H. Nassar

Abstract


Many real estate owners change the building in terms of the type of usage in response to changes in economic conditions and the requirements of the surrounding environment to get the best potential financial return. To investigate the possibilities of changing the real estate's usage, the owners of these existing structures turned to feasibility study experts for assistance in making the optimum alternatives. So, they need an integrated model between VE and BIM, especially applicable to an existing structure, to determine the optimum usage type for the existing structure. Value Engineering (VE) and Building Information Modeling (BIM) must be connected to profit from both outputs simultaneously. Previous studies only investigated the VE alternatives during the design phase; when they decided to reduce project costs by using construction materials alternatives, they ignored existing structure alternatives significantly when changing the usage type. This study attempts to provide an integrated model between VE and BIM that can be applied to the existing structure to assist in determining the best alternative in terms of the type of usage for such existing structures by conducting BIM methodology such as a feasibility study, including BIM software such as Revit and Primavera. A feasibility study that contains the bank rate of interest. As a result, the maximum financial return is obtained based on predetermined criteria and in compliance with decision-making requirements.

 

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-08-06

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Building Information Modeling (BIM); Value Engineering (VE); Optimal Solution; Feasibility Study; Integrated Model.

References


Hao, J. L., Cheng, B., Lu, W., Xu, J., Wang, J., Bu, W., & Guo, Z. (2020). Carbon emission reduction in prefabrication construction during materialization stage: A BIM-based life-cycle assessment approach. Science of the Total Environment, 723, 137870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137870.

Chung, B. Y., Syachrani, S., Jeong, H. S., & Kwak, Y. H. (2009). Applying process simulation technique to value engineering model: A case study of hospital building project. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(3), 549–559. doi:10.1109/TEM.2009.2013831.

Lee, M. J., Lim, J. K., & Hunter, G. (2010). Performance-based value engineering application to public highway construction. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(3), 261–271. doi:10.1007/s12205-010-0261-y.

Ahmaed, KH. A. A., & Pandey, R. K. (2016). Concept of Value Engineering in Construction Industry. (2016). International Journal of Science and Research, 5(4), 1231–1237. doi:10.21275/v5i4.nov162492.

Chitkara, K. K. (2014). Construction Project Management Planning, Scheduling and Controlling (3rd Ed.). McGraw Hill Education, New York, United States.

Moon, S., Ha, C., & Yang, J. (2012). Structured Idea Creation for Improving the Value of Construction Design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(7), 841–853. doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000491.

Rachwan, R., Abotaleb, I., & Elgazouli, M. (2016). The Influence of Value Engineering and Sustainability Considerations on the Project Value. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 34, 431–438. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.038.

Hergunsel, M. F. (2011). Benefits of building information modeling for construction managers and BIM based scheduling. Master Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, United States.

Sacks, R., Korb, S., & Barak, R. (2017). Building Lean, Building BIM: Improving Construction the Tidhar Way. Routledge, London, United Kingdom. doi:10.1201/9781315300511.

Sacks, R., & Pikas, E. (2021). Foundational concepts for BIM. BIM Teaching and Learning Handbook (1st Ed.), 5–22, Routledge, London, United Kingdom. doi:10.1201/9780367855192-3.

Li, X., Wang, C., & Alashwal, A. (2021). Case Study on BIM and Value Engineering Integration for Construction Cost Control. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 1–13. doi:10.1155/2021/8849303.

Dabade, U. (2021). Productivity Improvement through Cycle Time Reduction and Line Balancing: A Case Study of Machine Shop. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 9(10), 1548–1553. doi:10.22214/ijraset.2021.38643.

Wei, T., & Chen, Y. (2020). Green building design based on BIM and value engineering. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(9), 3699–3706. doi:10.1007/s12652-019-01556-z.

Park, C. S., Kim, H. J., Park, H. T., Goh, J. H., & Pedro, A. (2017). BIM-based idea bank for managing value engineering ideas. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 699–713. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.09.015.

SAVE International. (2017). Value methodology glossary. The Society of American Value Engineers. Available online: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.value-eng.org/resource/resmgr/certification/SAVE-VM-Glossary_Copyright_2.pdf (accessed on march 2022).

Oraee, M., Hosseini, M. R., Edwards, D., & Papadonikolaki, E. (2021). Collaboration in BIM-based construction networks: a qualitative model of influential factors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. doi:10.1108/ecam-10-2020-0865.

Chan, P. (2022). The consensus planning and Design Criteria for sustainable buildings in Cambodia. Preprints (MDPI), 1-15. doi:10.20944/preprints202204.0190.v1.

Zhang, S., Rong, X., Bakhtawar, B., Tariq, S., & Zayed, T. (2021). Assessment of feasibility, challenges, and critical success factors of MiC projects in Hong Kong. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 27(1), 04020047. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000452.

Veling, H., Becker, D., Liu, H., Quandt, J., & Holland, R. W. (2022). How go/no-go training changes behavior: A value-based decision-making perspective. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 47, 101206. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101206.

Durdyev, S., Mohandes, S. R., Tokbolat, S., Sadeghi, H., & Zayed, T. (2022). Examining the OHS of green building construction projects: A hybrid fuzzy-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 338, 130590. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130590.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-08-06

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022 Heba mustafa mahmoud mohamed khamis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message