Seismic Assessment of Tall Buildings Designed According to the Turkish Building Earthquake Code
Downloads
Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-03-011
Full Text: PDF
Downloads
[2] FEMA P-695. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factor. Applied Technology Council, Department of Homeland Security, FEMA. Washington, D.C., United States.
[3] Gogus, A., & Wallace, J. W. (2015). Seismic Safety Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Walls through FEMA P695 Methodology. Journal of Structural Engineering, 141(10), 04015002. doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001221.
[4] ACI 318-95. (1995). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. American concrete institute, Michigan, United States.
[5] Haselton, C. B., Liel, A. B., & Deierlein, G. G. (2010). Example application of the FEMA P695 (ATC-63) methodology for the collapse performance evaluation of reinforced concrete special moment frame systems. 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto, Canada.
[6] ASCE/SEI 7-05. (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Structural Engineering Institute. Virginia, United States. doi:10.1061/9780784408094.
[7] Li, T., Yang, T. Y., & Tong, G. (2019). Performance"based plastic design and collapse assessment of diagrid structure fused with shear link. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 28(6), e1589. doi:10.1002/tal.1589.
[8] Mashal, M., & Filiatrault, A. (2012). Quantification of seismic performance factors for buildings incorporating three-dimensional construction system. In World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
[9] Ezzeldin, M., Wiebe, L., & El-Dakhakhni, W. (2016). Seismic Collapse Risk Assessment of Reinforced Masonry Walls with Boundary Elements Using the FEMA P695 Methodology. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(11), 04016108. doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001579.
[10] Kuşyılmaz, A., & Topkaya, C. (2016). Evaluation of seismic response factors for eccentrically braced frames using FEMA P695 methodology. Earthquake Spectra, 32(1), 303-321. doi: 10.1193/071014EQS097M.
[11] Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2013). Seismic performance evaluation of staggered wall structures using FEMA P695 procedure. Magazine of Concrete Research, 65(17), 1023–1033. doi:10.1680/macr.12.00237.
[12] Khojastehfar, E., Mirzaei Aminian, F., & Ghanbari, H. (2021). Seismic risk analysis of concrete moment-resisting frames against near-fault earthquakes. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 235(1), 80–91. doi:10.1177/1748006X20940472.
[13] Sadeghpour, A., & Ozay, G. (2020). Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Frames Designed Based on Previous Iranian Seismic Codes. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(10), 8069–8085. doi:10.1007/s13369-020-04548-w.
[14] Siddiquee, K. N., Billah, A. M., & Issa, A. (2021). Seismic collapse safety and response modification factor of concrete frame buildings reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) rebar. Journal of Building Engineering, 42, 42 102468. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102468.
[15] Gallo, W. W. C., Gabbianelli, G., & Monteiro, R. (2021). Assessment of Multi-Criteria Evaluation Procedures for Identification of Optimal Seismic Retrofitting Strategies for Existing RC Buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1–34. doi:10.1080/13632469.2021.1878074.
[16] Mazza, F., & Vulcano, A. (2012). Effects of near-fault ground motions on the nonlinear dynamic response of base-isolated r.c. framed buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(2), 211–232. doi:10.1002/eqe.1126.
[17] Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical Stress"Strain Model for Confined Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8), 1804–1826. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
[18] Kolozvari, K., Orakcal, K., & Wallace, J. W. (2015). Shear-flexure interaction modeling for reinforced concrete structural walls and columns under reversed cyclic loading. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, PEER Report, University of California, Berkeley, United States.
[19] PEER. (2010). PEER Strong Motion Database. University of California, Berkeley, United States. Available online: https://peer.berkeley.edu/peer-strong-ground-motion-databases (accessed on January 2022).
[20] Wu, H., Wang, Q., Tiwari, N. D., & De Domenico, D. (2021). Comparison of Dynamic Responses of Parallel-Placed Adjacent High-Rise Buildings under Wind and Earthquake Excitations. Shock and Vibration, 2021, 6644158. doi:10.1155/2021/6644158.
[21] Rahgozar, N., Rahgozar, N., & Moghadam, A. S. (2019). Equivalent linear model for fully self-centering earthquake-resisting systems. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 28(1), 28 1565. doi:10.1002/tal.1565.
[22] Turkish Seismic Hazard Map. (2022). Ministry of Interior, Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (AFAD). Istanbul, Turkey. Available online: https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/deprem-tehlike-haritasi?lang=en (accessed on January 2022).
[23] Gerami, M., Mashayekhi, A. H., & Siahpolo, N. (2017). Computation of R factor for Steel Moment Frames by Using Conventional and Adaptive Pushover Methods. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 42(3), 1025–1037. doi:10.1007/s13369-016-2257-5.
[24] Amirsardari, A., Lumantarna, E., Rajeev, P., & Goldsworthy, H. M. (2020). Seismic Fragility Assessment of Non-ductile Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Australia. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1–34. doi:10.1080/13632469.2020.1750508.
- Authors retain all copyrights. It is noticeable that authors will not be forced to sign any copyright transfer agreements.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.