Numerical Modeling of Soil-Pile-Interaction with Near and Far Field Earthquake's Effects
Downloads
This paper studies Near and Far Field effects of the response of a column-pile to earthquakes considering Dynamic-Soil-Structure-Interaction (DSSI) effects in soft clay (Vs<180 m/s ) and stiff clay (180<Vs<375 m/s). Opensees software that can simulate the dynamic time history analysis is used. Both kinematic and inertial interactions are considered and Finite Element Method (FEM) is used to solve DSSI. The direct method applies to 3D modeling of the layered soil and column-pile. A Pressure Independ Multi Yield Surface Plasticity Model is used to simulate different kinds of clay behavior. Time history seismic analyses provide for the mass and stiffness matrices to evaluate dynamic structural response with and without directivity effects for Near and Far Field earthquakes. Results show that the Multi-Yield-Surface-Kinematic-Plasticity-Model can be used instead of bilinear springs between piles and clay soil, for both Near Field and Far Field earthquakes. In addition, comparing Near and Far Field analyses, acceleration response spectrum at the top of the structure in the Far Field increases with the softness of the soil more than that in the Near field.
Downloads
[2] B. A. Bolt and N. A. Abrahamson, 59 –Estimation of strong seismic ground motions, In Lee W, Kanamori H, Jennings CP, Kisslinger C, editors.: International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology-Part B. Academic Press [Chapter VII], 2003.
[3] P. G. Somervile, "Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse," Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 137, pp. 201-212, 2003.
[4] M. K. Kim, J. S. Lee and M. K. Kim, "Vertical Vibration Analysis of Soil-pile Interaction Systems Considering the Soil-pile Interface Behavior,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 8(2), pp. 221-226, 2004.
[5] [NFE05] EN 1997 -1. EUROCODE 7, "geotechnical design-part 1: general rules. 145p," 2005.
[6] G. Gazetas, V. Droses and N. Gerolymos, "Seismic response of single-column bent on pile: Evidence of beneficial role of pile and soil inelasticity," Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 547-573, 2009.
[7] H. B. Mason, "Seismic Performance Assessment in Dense Urban Environments. (Doctoral dissertation)," University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2011.
[8] P. G. Somerville, "Characterizing Near Fault Ground Motion For The Design And Evaluation Of Bridges," in Third National Seismic Conference & Workshop on Bridges & Highways, Portland, Oregon, 2002.
[9] C. A. Felippa, "A Family of Early-time Approximations for Fluid-Structure Interaction," Journal of Applied Mechanics, 47, pp. 703-708, 1980.
[10] J. Lysmer and R. L. Kuhlemeyer, "Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media"," Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Proc ASCE, Vol. 95, no. EM4, pp. 859-877, 1969.
[11] J. P. Wolf, Dynamic Soil-Structure-Interaction, Prentice-Hall, Englewood: Cliffs, New Jersey, 1985.
[12] Y. M. A. HASHASH and D. PARK, "SOIL DAMPING FORMULATION IN NONLINEAR TIME DOMAIN SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS," Journal of Earthquake Engineering 8(2), pp. 249-274, 2004.
[13] T. Haukaas and A. Der Kiureghian, "Finite element reliability and sensitivity methods for performance-based Earthquake Engineering," PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center), University of California, Berkeley, April 2004.
[14] A. E. Kampitsis, E. J. Sapountzakis, N. Giannakos and N. A. Georolymos, "Seismic soil–pile–structure kinematic and inertial interaction”A new beam approach," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 55, pp. 211-224, 2013.
[15] A. Elgamal, Z. Yang and E. Parra, "Computational modeling of cyclic mobility and post-liquefaction site response," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22(4), pp. 259-271, 2002.
[16] J. H. Prevost, "Anistropic Undrained Stress-Strain Behavior of Clays," Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 104(GT8), pp. 1075-1090, 1978.
[17] J. P. Stewart, A. O. Kwok, Y. M. A. Hashash, N. Matasovic, R. Pyke, Z. Wang and Z. Yang, "Benchmarking of Nonlinear Geotechnical Ground Response Analysis Procedures," Report No. PEER-08/04, Berkeley, California, 2008.
[18] Q. Gu, J. P. Conte, A. Elgamal, and Z. Yang, "Finite-element response sensitivity analysis of multi-yield-surface J2 plasticity model by direct differentiation method," Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering 198(30-32), pp. 2272-2285, 2008.
[19] Q. Gu, J. P. Conte, and A. Elgamal, "Consistent tangent moduli for multi for multi-yield-surface J2 plasticity model," Computational Mechanics 48(1), pp. 97-120, 2011.
[20] S. Wang, B. L. Kutter, J. M. Chacko, D. W. Wilson, R. W. Boulangar and A. Abghari, "Nonlinear seismic soil-pile-superstructure interaction," Earthquake Spectra Vol.14, Issue 2, pp. 377-396, 1998.
[21] A. E. Kampitsis, E. J. Sapountzakis, S. K. Giannakos and N. A. Gerolymos, "SEISMIC SOIL-PILE INTERACTION ” INFLUENCE OF SOIL INELASTICITY," in 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Kos Island, Greece, 12-14 June 2013.
[22] S. Mazzoni, F. McKenna and G. Fenves, "Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation User Manual," Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley University (http://opensees.berkeley.edu/), California, 2006.
[23] S. Helwany, Applied Soil Mechanics with Abaqus Applications, Hoboken, New Jersey, ISA: John Wiley and Sons, ISBN:9780471791072, 2007.
- Authors retain all copyrights. It is noticeable that authors will not be forced to sign any copyright transfer agreements.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
