Stiffness Degradation Effects on Seismic Behavior of RC Frame Structures
Downloads
This study investigates the influence of stiffness degradation on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) frame structures, focusing on global response parameters including roof lateral displacement ratio (Δ/H), fundamental period (T1), and internal force redistribution. Nonlinear finite element analyses were conducted in SAP2000 for three representative RC frames (3-, 10-, and 20-story), considering beam-only, column-only, and combined stiffness degradation scenarios. The analytical framework integrates theoretical derivations of effective stiffness models with response-spectrum-based simulations, following the provisions of Vietnamese code (TCVN 9386:2012) and American code (ACI 318-25), as well as the formulations proposed by Paulay & Priestley, Elwood & Eberhard, and Tran & Li. The results reveal a clear height-dependent and nonlinear relationship between stiffness degradation and seismic response. In low-rise frames, beam stiffness reduction primarily governs lateral deformation, whereas column stiffness degradation dominates the dynamic behavior and internal force concentration in medium- and high-rise systems. When the effective stiffness ratio falls below EId/EIg =0.5, roof drift and fundamental period increase sharply, and internal forces at the column base (M and Q) are amplified, leading to excessive deformation and potential instability. Among the models examined, the Tran & Li formulation provided the highest accuracy and stability when validated against experimental data. The findings emphasize that column stiffness should not be reduced below 50% of the gross section stiffness in high-rise frames to maintain acceptable vibration periods and control lateral drift. The novelty of this work lies in quantifying the nonlinear, height-dependent influence of stiffness degradation across multiple structural parameters, bridging the gap between component-level deterioration and system-level seismic performance. The results provide height-sensitive insights for improving nonlinear seismic analysis and performance-based design of RC frame buildings.
Downloads
[1] Tran, T.-H. (2025). Energy Dissipation and Stiffness Assessment: A Study on RC Frame Joints Reinforced with UHPSFRC. Structural Durability & Health Monitoring, 19(4), 869–886. doi:10.32604/sdhm.2025.064902.
[2] Galatage, A. A., & Patil, S. B. (2025). Seismic Assessment of First and Second Secant Stiffness for the Masonry Infilled RC Frame. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 11(2), 472–487. doi:10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-02-05.
[3] Pham, P. A. H., Le, C. V., & Nguyen, V. T. (2025). Effect of Infill Wall Opening Ratio on the Mechanical Characteristics of Reinforced Concrete Frames. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 11(8), 3454–3472. doi:10.28991/CEJ-2025-011-08-020.
[4] Paulay, T., & Priestly, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States. doi:10.1002/9780470172841.
[5] Pham, P. A. H., & Hung, C. C. (2024). An Approach for Plastic Hinge Length of RC Columns. Recent Advances in Structural Health Monitoring and Engineering Structures, SHM&ES 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 460, Springer, Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-97-0399-9_5.
[6] TCVN 9386:2012. (2012). Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Construction Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam. (In Vietnamese).
[7] ASCE/SEI 41-23. (2023). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, United States. doi:10.1061/9780784416112.
[8] ACI Committee 318. (2025). Building Code for Structural Concrete—Code Requirements and Commentary. American Concrete Institute (ACI), Farmington Hills, United States.
[9] Hopkins, D. C. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 25(4), 362. doi:10.5459/bnzsee.25.4.362.
[10] Elwood, K. J., & Eberhard, M. O. (2009). Effective Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Columns. ACI Structural Journal, 106(4). doi:10.14359/56613.
[11] Ngoc Tran, C. T., & Li, B. (2012). Initial stiffness of reinforced concrete columns with moderate aspect ratios. Advances in Structural Engineering, 15(2), 265–276. doi:10.1260/1369-4332.15.2.265.
[12] Anh Huy, P. P., Yuen, T. Y., Hung, C. C., & Mosalam, K. M. (2022). Seismic behaviour of full-scale lightly reinforced concrete columns under high axial loads. Journal of Building Engineering, 56, 104817. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104817.
[13] Pham, H. P. (2023). Shear strength model of large-scale reinforced concrete rectangular columns with light transverse reinforcement. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(1), 219–244. doi:10.1007/s42107-022-00499-9.
[14] Gesualdi, G., Viggiani, L. R. S., & Cardone, D. (2020). Seismic performance of RC frame buildings accounting for the out-of-plane behavior of masonry infills. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(11), 5343–5381. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00904-1.
[15] Dong, G., Garcia, R., Pilakoutas, K., & Hajirasouliha, I. (2024). A review of optimum seismic design of RC frames: State-of-the-art, challenges and future directions. Engineering Structures, 315, 118455. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118455.
[16] Liu, W., Givens, J. D., Kanitkar, R., & Blaney, C. (2009). Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of a Three Story Pre-Northridge Steel Frame Essential Service Facility. Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures, 56–67. doi:10.1061/41084(364)6.
[17] Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., & Fenves, G. L. (2006). OpenSees command language manual. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees), Pacific earthquake engineering research (PEER) center, University of California, Berkeley, United States.
[18] Raja, D., & Rani, N. (2023). Analysis of progressive collapse of building using ETABS. Materials Today: Proceedings, 93, 278–286. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.257.
[19] Computers and Structures Inc. (2016). Implemented E. SAP2000® Version 19.0. 0 Release Notes 2016. Computers and Structures Inc., California, United States.
[20] Khoshraftar, A., & Abbasnia, R. (2010). The effect of degradation on seismic damage of RC buildings. The International Conference on Civil and Architecture Engineering, 8(8), 1–11. doi:10.21608/iccae.2010.44423.
[21] Kumar, R., & Singh, Y. (2010). Stiffness of reinforced concrete frame members for seismic analysis. ACI Structural Journal, 107(5), 607–615. doi:10.14359/51663914.
[22] Lima, C., Martinelli, E., Macorini, L., & Izzuddin, B. A. (2017). Modelling beam-to-column joints in seismic analysis of RC frames. Earthquake and Structures, 12(1), 119–133. doi:10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.119.
[23] Guo, Z., Zhang, Y., Lu, J., & Fan, J. (2016). Stiffness degradation-based damage model for RC members and structures using fiber-beam elements. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 15(4), 697–714. doi:10.1007/s11803-016-0359-4.
[24] Hamidia, M., Afzali, M., Jamshidian, S., & Safi, M. (2023). Post-earthquake stiffness loss estimation for reinforced concrete columns using fractal analysis of crack patterns. Structural Concrete, 24(3), 3933–3951. doi:10.1002/suco.202200351.
[25] Loh, C. H., Mao, C. H., Huang, J. R., & Pan, T. C. (2011). System identification and damage evaluation of degrading hysteresis of reinforced concrete frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 40(6), 623–640. doi:10.1002/eqe.1051.
[26] Hung, C. C., Pham, P. A. H., Yuen, T. Y., & Mosalam, K. M. (2024). Full-scale cyclic testing of slender RC columns bent in double curvature under high axial load. Journal of Building Engineering, 82(108186). doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108186.
[27] Di Sarno, L., & Amiri, S. (2019). Period elongation of deteriorating structures under mainshock-aftershock sequences. Engineering Structures, 196(109341). doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109341.
- Authors retain all copyrights. It is noticeable that authors will not be forced to sign any copyright transfer agreements.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
