1. Home
  2. Vol 10, No 7 (2024)
  3. Shwaly

Assessing Multifaceted Effects of Speed Humps and Bumps: Travel Time, Safety, and Environmental Considerations

Sayed A. Shwaly, Amal El-Ayaat, Reem Osman

Abstract


This study focuses on investigating the significant impacts of speed breakers on various parameters, including travel time delays, vehicle speeds, fuel consumption, pavement maintenance costs, and vehicular exhaust emissions. Field data was collected and analyzed to assess the effects of different types of traffic calming measures on these parameters. The findings provide valuable insights into the implications of speed breakers on road safety, environmental pollution, and overall road infrastructure management. The results reveal that the implementation of speed humps, speed bumps, and triple bumps effectively slows down vehicles, as evidenced by considerable reductions in the 85th percentile speeds. The reduction percentages were 41.65% for speed humps, 73.52% for speed bumps, and 86.27% for triple bumps. This indicates the effectiveness of these traffic calming measures in improving road safety by reducing vehicle speeds. However, the presence of speed breakers also leads to increased travel time delays. On average, traversing stretches with speed humps, speed bumps, and triple bumps resulted in delays of 9.31, 16.42, and 29.51 seconds, respectively. While the individual delay times may appear relatively short, the cumulative effect of multiple speed obstacles along a road needs to be considered. Another significant impact observed is the increased fuel consumption associated with speed breakers. The study found that for every 100 km of travel, motorcycles and passenger cars consumed approximately 12.07 km and 27.37 km of additional fuel, respectively, when the density of speed breakers was 1.33/km. This translates to a fuel consumption increase of 13.73% for motorcycles and 37.74% for passenger cars. Furthermore, the presence of speed humps was found to contribute to pavement deterioration, as indicated by decreased Pavement Condition Index (PCI) values. The study also revealed that sections with speed humps incurred significantly higher maintenance costs compared to sections without speed humps. The increase in maintenance cost ranged from 100 to 264% across different road sections, with higher traffic volumes leading to greater cost escalation. Additionally, the study confirms that lower vehicle speeds, particularly between 0-15 km/hr, are associated with higher emissions of pollutants, including carbon monoxide (CO) and other pollutants. This highlights the environmental implications of speed breakers and their contribution to urban air pollution.

 

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-07-07

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Speed Humps; Speed Bumps; Travel Time Delays; Fuel Consumption; Pavement Maintenance; Exhaust Emissions.

References


Lockwood, I. M. (1997). ITE traffic calming definition. ITE Journal (Institute of Transportation Engineers), 67(7), 22–24.

Patel, A. (2021). It’s Not Just a Sign: Traffic Calming Gives Bump to Safety–A Cost Benefit Analysis of Traffic Calming in the City of Los Angeles. Institute of Transportation Studies, UCLA, Los Angeles, United States. doi:10.17610/T6HK5G.

Chimba, D., & Mbuya, C. (2019). Simulating the impact of traffic calming strategies. Transportation Research Center Reports. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, United States.

Leonardi, S., & Distefano, N. (2024). Traffic-Calming Measures as an Instrument for Revitalizing the Urban Environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(4), 1407. doi:10.3390/su16041407.

Goel, R., Tiwari, G., Varghese, M., Bhalla, K., Agrawal, G., Saini, G., Jha, A., John, D., Saran, A., White, H., & Mohan, D. (2024). Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(1), 1367. doi:10.1002/cl2.1367.

Kiran, K. R., Kumar, M., & Abhinay, B. (2020). Critical Analysis of Speed Hump and Speed Bump and Geometric Design of Curved Speed Hump. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 1211–1226. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.144.

Falamarzi, A., Abdullah, R. A., Rahmat, R. A. A. O. K., & Shokri, F. (2014). Developing an innovative algorithm for implementing vertical traffic calming measures. Proceedings of the Malaysian Universities Transport Research Forum Conference, 2-4 December, 2014, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Majer, S., & Sołowczuk, A. (2023). Traffic Calming Measures and Their Slowing Effect on the Pedestrian Refuge Approach Sections. Sustainability, 15(21), 15265. doi:10.3390/su152115265.

Ewing, R. (2017). US traffic calming manual. Routledge, New York, United States. doi:10.4324/9781351179652.

Shwaly, S. A., Zakaria, M. H., & Al-Ayaat, A. H. (2018). Development of Ideal Hump Geometric Characteristics for Different Vehicle Types “case Study” Urban Roads in Kafr El-Sheikh City (Egypt). Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018, 1–12. doi:10.1155/2018/3093594.

Gyaase, D., Newton, S., Adams, C. A., Enuameh, Y., Adjei, B. N., & Nakua, E. K. (2023). Effect of speed humps on injury consequences on trunk roads traversing towns in Ghana: A quasi-experimental study. Injury prevention, 29(1), 68-73. doi:10.1136/ip-2022-044598.

Kırbaş, U., & Karaşahin, M. (2018). Comparison of Speed Control Bumps and Humps according to Whole-Body Vibration Exposure. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 144(9), 4018054. doi:10.1061/jtepbs.0000177.

Sheykhfard, A., Haghighi, F., Zadkhori, M., Shaaban, K., & Yoosefi, H. (2023). Geometry optimization of speed humps based on ride comfort and driving-safety-based assessment. Transportation research record, 2677(8), 270-290. doi:10.1177/03611981231156574.

Distefano, N., & Leonardi, S. (2019). Evaluation of the benefits of traffic calming on vehicle speed reduction. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 7(4), 200–214. doi:10.13189/cea.2019.070403.

Yeo, J., Lee, J., Cho, J., Kim, D. K., & Jang, K. (2020). Effects of speed humps on vehicle speed and pedestrian crashes in South Korea. Journal of Safety Research, 75, 78–86. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2020.08.003.

Hallmark, S., Knapp, K., Thomas, G., & Smith, D. (2002). Temporary speed hump impact evaluation. No. CTRE Project 00-73, Iowa State University, Ames, United States.

Zech, W. C., Walker, D., Turochy, R. E., Shoemaker, A., & Hool, J. N. (2009). Effectiveness of speed tables as a traffic calming measure on a college campus street. No. 09-2841, Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, 11-15 January, 2009, Washington, United States.

Advani, N., Danak, H., Dutta, M., & Jena, S. (2024). Spherical Cap Studs: A novel speed bump alternative to reduce discomfort with effective speed reduction. Traffic Injury Prevention, 25(2), 228–236. doi:10.1080/15389588.2023.2278415.

Samal, S. R., Mohanty, M., & Biswal, D. R. (2022). A review of effectiveness of speed reducing devices with focus on developing countries. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 13(1), 65–73. doi:10.5507/tots.2021.018.

Mohanty, M., Raj, Y., Rout, S., Tiwari, U., Roy, S., & Samal, S. R. (2021). Operational effects of speed breakers: a case study in India. European Transport, 81(1), 1-10. doi:10.17610/T6HK5G.

Bunte, L. W. (2000). Traffic calming programs & emergency response: a competition of two public goods. Master Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.

Ahn, K., & Rakha, H. (2009). A field evaluation case study of the environmental and energy impacts of traffic calming. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(6), 411–424. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2009.01.007.

Obregón-Biosca, S. A. (2020). Speed humps and speed tables: Externalities on vehicle speed, pollutant emissions and fuel consumption. Results in Engineering, 5, 100089. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100089.

Januševičius, T., & Grubliauskas, R. (2019). The effect of speed bumps and humps on the concentrations of CO, NO and NO2 in ambient air. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, 12(5), 635–642. doi:10.1007/s11869-019-00683-y.

Hu, Y. C., Li, Q. L., Liu, J., Wang, J. X., & Wang, B. H. (2024). Effect of speed humps on instantaneous traffic emissions in a microscopic model with limited deceleration capacity. Chinese Physics B, 33(6). doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ad2608.

AlKheder, S. (2023). The effect of traffic at speed bumps in residential areas on noise and air pollution. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(33), 80945–80962. doi:10.1007/s11356-023-28187-4.

Bahar, G., Smahel, T., & Smiley, A. (2009). Study of the Environmental, Economic, Safety and Social Benefits of Roundabouts. Director General Surface Policy Transport Canada, Vancouver, Canada.

Gamlath, K. G. D., Amarasingha, N., & Wickramasinghe, V. (2023). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Speed Humps Related to Speed Profile and Noise Profile. Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 1(2), 1–13. doi:10.54389/opdo92.

Öz, E., Küçükkelepçe, O., Kurt, O., & Çavuş, A. C. (2023). Effect of Speed Humps on Ambulance Delay. Cureus, 15(1), e33722. doi:10.7759/cureus.33722.

Demisa, M. G., Taddesse, E., Tegegne, T. G., & Almeneh, A. (2023). Speed Hump Effect on Pavement Condition for Addis Ababa City Roads Case Study. SSRN Electronic Journal, 4494823. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4494823.

Shakhan, M. R., Topal, A., & Sengoz, B. (2023). The influence of truck speed on pavement defects. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 24(2), 2128348. doi:10.1080/10298436.2022.2128348.

Abdel-Wahed, T. A., & Hashim, I. H. (2017). Effect of speed hump characteristics on pavement condition. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 4(1), 103–110. doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2016.09.011.

Chahar, A., & Singh, S. K. (2018). Evaluation Based on Visual Inspection, namely on the Distresses Observed on the Pavement. World Wide Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1, 10–13.

Naimi, S., & Karimi, M. A. (2019). Pavement Management System Investigation in Case of Afghanistan. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 40(1), 221–232. doi:10.17776/csj.471334.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-07-07

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Sayed A. Shwaly, Amal El-ayaat, Reem Osman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message