Evaluating Carbon Footprint in the Life Cycle Design of Residential Concrete Structures in Jordan

Omar Al-Omari, Ahmad Alkhdor, M. Abed Al-Rawashdeh, M. R. Al-Ruwaishedi, S. B. Al-Rawashdeh

Abstract


The construction industry is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, and there is a growing global interest in reducing the environmental impact of carbon dioxide emissions associated with building construction and operation. Concrete, the most commonly used material in construction, is known to release a substantial amount of environmentally harmful waste throughout its life cycle, including production, construction, operation, and demolition. The worldwide production and consumption of concrete contribute to approximately 5% of all human-related CO2 emissions each year. To assess the carbon footprint of concrete manufacturing and its application in construction projects, a comprehensive approach called life cycle assessment (LCA) is necessary. This paper presents a new process-based LCA approach to analyze carbon emissions and evaluate the carbon footprint of concrete from raw material extraction to the end-of-life stage. To address carbon emissions throughout the life cycle of concrete structures in the Middle East, the study adopts a case study approach, focusing on selected concrete structures in Jordan. The findings from these case studies highlight that the operational phase of concrete structures is the primary contributor to carbon emissions. By thoroughly examining the carbon cycle within structures and their interactions with the surrounding ecosystem, significant reductions in CO2 emissions, environmental deterioration, and its consequences can be achieved.

 

Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-07-07

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Carbon Footprint; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Concrete, Residential Buildings; Jordan.

References


Solís-Guzmán, J., Rivero-Camacho, C., Alba-Rodríguez, D., & Martínez-Rocamora, A. (2018). Carbon footprint estimation tool for residential buildings for non-specialized users: OERCO2 project. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(5), 51359. doi:10.3390/su10051359.

Ametepey, S. O., & Ansah, S. K. (2014). Impacts of construction activities on the environment: the case of Ghana. Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation, 4(sup-1), 934-948.

Zhou, P., & Wang, M. (2016). Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review. Ecological Economics, 125, 47–59. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.001.

Kim, T. H., Chae, C. U., Kim, G. H., & Jang, H. J. (2016). Analysis of CO2 emission characteristics of concrete used at construction sites. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(4). doi:10.3390/su8040348.

Mardiana, A., & Riffat, S. B. (2015). Building energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions: threat to climate change. Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change, 2015(S3), 1-3. doi:10.4172/2157-7617.s3-001.

Hasanbeigi, A., Price, L., & Lin, E. (2012). Emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission-reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: A technical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 6220-6238. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.07.019.

Jahandideh, F., Raman, S. N., Jamil, M., & Syed, Z. I. (2020). Carbon footprint assessment in the life-cycle design of concrete structures in the tropics: A case study of residential buildings in Malaysia. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 20(2), 27–34. doi:10.22452/jdbe.vol20no2.3.

Latawiec, R., Woyciechowski, P., & Kowalski, K. (2018). Sustainable Concrete Performance -CO2-Emission. Environments, 5(2), 27. doi:10.3390/environments5020027.

Garcez, M. R., Rohden, A. B., & Graupner de Godoy, L. G. (2018). The role of concrete compressive strength on the service life and life cycle of a RC structure: Case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 27–38. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.153.

Sizirici, B., Fseha, Y., Cho, C. S., Yildiz, I., & Byon, Y. J. (2021). A review of carbon footprint reduction in construction industry, from design to operation. Materials, 14(20), 6094. doi:10.3390/ma14206094.

Paik, I., & Na, S. (2019). Comparison of carbon dioxide emissions of the ordinary reinforced concrete slab and the voided slab system during the construction phase: A case study of a residential building in South Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(13), 33571. doi:10.3390/su11133571.

Gursel, A. P. (2014). Life-cycle assessment of concrete: decision-support tool and case study application. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, United States.

Purnell, P. (2013). The carbon footprint of reinforced concrete. Advances in Cement Research, 25(6), 362–368. doi:10.1680/adcr.13.00013.

Islam, H., Zhang, G., Setunge, S., & Bhuiyan, M. A. (2016). Life cycle assessment of shipping container home: A sustainable construction. Energy and Buildings, 128, 673–685. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.002.

Czarnecki, L., & Justnes, H. (2012). Sustainable & durable concrete. Cement Lime Concrete, 6, 341.

Kajaste, R., & Hurme, M. (2016). Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions - Management options and abatement cost. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 4041–4052. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.055.

Jensen, A. A. (1998). Life cycle assessment (LCA): a guide to approaches, experiences and information sources. Environmental issue report No 6. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Preece, J., Crawford, J., McKee, K., Flint, J., & Robinson, D. (2020). Understanding changing housing aspirations: a review of the evidence. Housing Studies, 35(1), 87–106. doi:10.1080/02673037.2019.1584665.

Chen, W., Yang, S., Zhang, X., Jordan, N. D., & Huang, J. (2022). Embodied energy and carbon emissions of building materials in China. Building and Environment, 207, 108434. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108434.

Alotaibi, B. S., Khan, S. A., Abuhussain, M. A., Al-Tamimi, N., Elnaklah, R., & Kamal, M. A. (2022). Life Cycle Assessment of Embodied Carbon and Strategies for Decarbonization of a High-Rise Residential Building. Buildings, 12(8), 1203. doi:10.3390/buildings12081203.

Evangelista, P. P. A., Kiperstok, A., Torres, E. A., & Gonçalves, J. P. (2018). Environmental performance analysis of residential buildings in Brazil using life cycle assessment (LCA). Construction and Building Materials, 169, 748–761. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.045.

Robayo-Salazar, R., Mejía-Arcila, J., Mejía de Gutiérrez, R., & Martínez, E. (2018). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of an alkali-activated binary concrete based on natural volcanic pozzolan: A comparative analysis to OPC concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 176, 103–111. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.017.

Ahmed, I. M., & Tsavdaridis, K. D. (2018). Life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost (LCC) studies of lightweight composite flooring systems. Journal of Building Engineering, 20, 624–633. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.013.

Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014). Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 394–416. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037.

Urban Land Institute. (2014). The Macro View on Micro Units. Urban Land Institute, Washington, United States. Available online: https://uli.org/wp-content/uploads/ULI-Documents/MicroUnit_full_rev_2015.pdf (accessed on April 2023).

Maisam Synopsis, C. (2015). Residential Projects Company Synopsis. Available online: http://www.maisam.com.jo/sites/ default/files/Residential.pdf (accessed on April 2023).


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-07-07

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 omar al-omari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message