Improving Building Longevity, Adaptability, and Sustainability: Examination of Multi-Unit Residential Building Regulations in Taiwan

Yi-kai Juan, Yu-Ching Cheng


Effectively enhancing buildings’ adaptability, extending their service lives, and reducing construction wastes has become a crucial issue in the construction industry. As the transformation of the socio-economic structure and diversification of user demands has grown, occupants in residence may have various needs in different stages, rethinking a sustainable and flexible living space has received substantial focus. “Open building (OB)” is an innovative method to accommodate various changeable occupant spaces, decrease the waste caused by space adjustment and reduce maintenance costs. Although the concept of OB is beneficial for sustainable built environments, the promotion of OB in Taiwan is constrained. One of the obstacles is that the OB approach is partly in conflict with the current building regulations. Without legally developed policies, developers are reluctant to supply OB housing in the market; occupants are unwilling to take the risk of implementing OB approaches in renovation. This study applied a Kano two-dimensional quality model to classify and prioritize OB regulation suggestions proposed by experts in Taiwan. A series of forums and interviews were conducted to develop OB regulations. Barriers and challenges will be discussed for further OB development that can be applied to improve building longevity, adaptability, and sustainability.


Adaptive Use; Building Longevity; Open Building; Kano Two-Dimensional Quality Model; Building Regulations.


Bureau of Energy (BOE), Ministry of Economic Affairs, R.O.C. Energy Supply (by Energy Form) & Total Domestic Consumption (by Sector). Energy Statistical annual Reports. Available online at: (accessed Nov. 9, 2017)

Mjörnell, K., Boss, A., Lindahl, M., Molnar, S. “A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability.” Sustainability 6(July 2014): 4227-4245. doi:10.3390/su6074227.

Markelj, J., Kuzman, M. K., Grošelj, P., Zbašnik-Senegačnik, M. “A Simplified Method for Evaluating Building Sustainability in the Early Design Phase for Architects.” Sustainability 6(December 2014): 8775-8795. doi:10.3390/su6128775.

Lin, Y. H. Research of Public Housing Policy in Taiwan. Real Corp Conference 2011: Change for stability- lifecycles of cities and regions, Essen, Germany, 18 - 20 May, 2011.

Altan, H., Gasperini, N., Moshaver, S., Frattari, A. “Redesigning Terraced Social Housing in the UK for Flexibility Using Building Energy Simulation with Consideration of Passive Design.” Sustainability 7(May 2015): 5488-5507. doi:10.3390/su7055488.

Altaş, N. E., Özsoy, A. “Spatial Adaptability and Flexibility as Parameters of User Satisfaction for Quality Housing.” Building and Environment 33(September 1998): 315–323.

Golubchikov, O., Badyina. A. Sustainable Housing for Sustainable Cities: A Policy Framework for Developing countries. 2012: Nairobi: UN-HABITAT.

Yi, Y.K., Yi, Y. K. “Environmental Performance of Furniture Layouts in SI Housing.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 9(November 2010), 547-553.

Slaughter, E.S. “Design Strategies to Increase Building Flexibility.” Building Research and Information 29(2001): 208-217.

Li, G., Fan, Y., Li, Z. Open Design for Adaptability in Chinese Public Housing. The Future of Open Building Conference, Zürich, September 9-11, 2015.

Zairul, M.N, Geraedts, R. New business model of flexible housing and circular economy. The Future of Open Building Conference, Zürich, September 9-11, 2015.

Habraken, N. J. Supports: an Alternative to Mass Housing. 1972: London: The Architectural Press.

Kendall, S. “Open Building: An Approach to Sustainable Architecture.” Journal of Urban Technology 6(1999): 1-16.

Tan, G. “The Open and Adaptive Tradition: Applying the Concepts of Open Building and Multi-Purpose Design in Traditional Chinese Vernacular Architecture.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 10(May 2011): 7-14.

Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior. Obstructive factors and improving strategies for Open Building implementation. 2012. Available online at: (in Chinese).

Habraken, N. J. Variation, the Systematic Design of Supports. 1976: USA: The MIT Press.

Wong, J. F. “Factors Affecting Open Building Implementation in High Density Mass Housing Design in Hong Kong.” Habitat International 34(April 2010): 174-182.

Iker, G. I., Alfonso, A. G. Indoor Flexibility by Industrialized Methods: a Way to Improve Use of Dwellings. The 16th Annual Conference of the CIB W104 Open Building Implementation, Bilbao, Spain, 17-19 May, 2010.

Abe, J., Fukao, S., Kadowaki, K., Ikawa, A. Proposals to Improve the Housing Estates in Tama New Town, Japan. The 10th Annual Conference of the CIB W104 Open Building Implementation, 2004, Paris, France.

Ohara, T., Suzuki, K., Oshi. Y. SI Housing Project - Flexsus House 22 Sustainable Housing System. The 6th Annual Conference of the CIB W104 Open Building Implementation, 2000, Tokyo, Japan.

Shushi, D., Mitsuo, T., Hidetoshi, Y., Midori, K. The Experiments of Installing and Changing Infill in “Infill Laboratory Glass Cube” of the Experimental Housing Next21. The 16th Annual Conference of the CIB W104 Open Building Implementation, 2010, Bilbao, Spain.

Urban Renaissance Agency, Japan. Mukougaoka 1st Multi-Unit Residential Building (MURB). Available online: (accessed Oct. 15, 2017, in Japanese).

Kendall, S., Teicher, J. Residential Open Building. 2000: New York: E & FN Spon.

Kendall, S. How an Infill Industry will Change Architecture. The 18th International Conference of Open Building Implementation, Beijing, China, 19-22 November 2012.

National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, Japan. SI Housing Guideline. Available online: (accessed Oct. 20, 2017, in Japanese).

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan. Long-life Housing Policy. Available online: (accessed Nov. 1, 2017, in Japanese).

Kazunobu, M. The New Japanese Housing Policy and Research and Development to Promote the Longer Life of Housing. The 16th Annual Conference of the CIB W104 Open Building Implementation, Bilbao, Spain, 17-19 May, 2010.

Minami, K. “The Efforts to Develop Longer Life Housing with Adaptability in Japan.” Energy Procedia 96(September 2016): 662-673.

Li, S. A View of Flexible Housing in China. International Journal of Architectural and Environmental Engineering 8(2014): 958-962.

Housing Industrialization Promotion Center, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. The Technical Guideline for Construction of China Skeleton-Infill Housing. 2010: China: China Architecture and Building Press. (in Chinese).

Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S. “Attractive Quality and Must-be Quality.” The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 14(1984): 39-48.

Berger, C., Blauth, R., Boger, D., Bolster C., Burchill, G., Duouchel, W., Pouliot, F., Richter, R., Rubinoff, A., Shen, D., Timko, M., Walden, D. “Kano’s Methods for Understanding Customer-defined Quality.” Center for Quality Management Journal 2(1993): 3-35.

Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H. H. “How to Make Product Development Projects More Successful by Integrating Kano’s Model of Customer Satisfaction into Quality Function Deployment.” Technovation 8(January 1998): 25-38.

Xu, Q., Jiao, R. J., Yang, X., Helander, M., Khalid, H. M. Opperud, A. “An Analytical Kano Model for Customer Need Analysis.” Design Studies, 30(January 2009): 87-110.

Lin, S. P., Yang, C. L., Chan, Y. H., Sheu, C. “Refining Kano’s Quality Attributes–Satisfaction’ Model: A moderated regression approach.” International Journal of Production Economics 126(August 2010): 255-263.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/cej-030999


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Yi-kai Juan, Yu-Ching Cheng

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.