Comparing Seismic Performance of Steel Structures Equipped with Viscous Dampers and Lead Rubber Bearing Base Isolation under Near-Field Earthquake

Mohammad Ganji, Hossein Kazem

Abstract


In the present research, seismic behaviours of a steel frame equipped with either viscous damper or lead-core rubber bearings (LRB) isolator were evaluated and compared under the effect of near-fault earthquake records. For this purpose, three buildings of 5, 10, and 15 stories equipped with lateral bearing systems composed of steel moment-resisting frames were subjected to 7 near-fault earthquake accelerogram pairs at earthquake hazard levels 1 and 2, so as to evaluate their responses under three scenarios, namely without any energy dissipation system, with viscous damper, and with LRB isolator, using dynamic analysis of time history utilizing PERFORM 3D v5 software. The results were indicative of enhancement in seismic performance of the viscous damper-equipped structures at earthquake hazard level 1, as the corresponding performance level was enhanced from life safety to uninterrupted usability, while no significant seismic performance level enhancement was determined at seismic level 2. Seismic isolator-equipped structures were also associated with seismic performance level enhancement from life safety to uninterrupted usability at both earthquake hazard levels. Relative lateral displacement at floor levels in damper-equipped structures and seismic isolator-installed buildings were found to be about 29% and 68% improved over that of the structure with no energy dissipation system. Results of distribution of shear forces within structures equipped with viscous damper and seismic isolator, as compared against that of the structures with no energy dissipation system, indicted increased and decreased shear forces, respectively..


Keywords


Seismic Performance; Base Isolation; Time History Analysis; Near-Field Earthquake.

References


Vice Presidency for Strategic Planning and Supervision, Guideline and Details for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existent Building (No. 524), 2011.

Soong, T.T. & Constantinou, M.C. “Passive and Active Structural Vibration Control in Civil Engineering. New York: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research”, 1994, State University Of New York At Buffalo

Vice Presidency for Strategic Planning and Supervision, Guideline for Design and Practice of Base Isolation Systems in Buildings (No. 523), 2010.

Tabeshpour, M.R., Effect of site and distance on shape of time history of ground motion and structural response. 01st National Conference on Retrofiting of Iran, 2006, Iran. Tehran

Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center., Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Building. Standard No. 2800 (4th Edition). 2014, Iran, Tehran, BHRC Publication No.: S-253

Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-P695, Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, 2009.

Vice Presidency for Strategic Planning and Supervision, Instruction for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (No. 360), 2014.

Lu, L.Y., Lin, C.C. & Lin, G.L. Experimental evaluation of supplemental viscous damping for a sliding isolation system under pulse-like base excitations. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2013, 332, 1982-1999.

Robinson, W.H. Lead-Rubber Hysteretic Bearings Suitable for Protecting Structures during Earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,1982, 10, 593-604.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2017 Mohammad Ganji, Hossein Kazem

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message