Sensitivity of Direct Runoff to Curve Number Using the SCS-CN Method
Abstract
This study explores the impact of runoff curve number (CN) on the hydrological model outputs for the Morai watershed, Sindh-Pakistan, using the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method. The SCS-CN method is an empirical technique used to estimate rainfall-runoff volume from precipitation in small watersheds, and CN is an empirically derived parameter used to calculate direct runoff from a rainfall event. CN depends on soil type, its condition, and the land use and land cover (LULC) of an area. Precise knowledge of these factors was not available for the study area, and therefore, a range of values was selected to analyze the sensitivity of the model to the changing CN values. Sensitivity analysis involves a methodological manipulation of model parameters to understand their impacts on model outputs. A range of CN values from 40-90 was selected to determine their effects on model results at the sub-catchment level during the historic flood year of 2010. The model simulated 362 cumecs of peak discharge for CN=90; however, for CN=40, the discharge reduced substantially to 78 cumecs (a 78.46% reduction). Event-based comparison of water volumes for different groups of CN values—90-75, 80-75, 75-70, and 90-40 —showed reductions in water availability of 8.88%, 3.39%, 3.82%, and 41.81%, respectively. Although it is known that the higher the CN, the greater the discharge from direct runoff and the less initial losses, the sensitivity analysis quantifies that impact and determines the amount of associated discharges with changing CN values. The results of the case study suggest that CN is one of the most influential parameters in the simulation of direct runoff. Knowledge of accurate runoff is important in both wet (flood management) and dry periods (water availability). A wide range in the resulting water discharges highlights the importance of precise CN selection. Sensitivity analysis is an essential facet of establishing hydrological models in limited data watersheds. The range of CNs demonstrates an enormous quantitative consequence on direct runoff, the exactness of which is necessary for effective water resource planning and management. The method itself is not novel, but the way it is proposed here can justify investments in determining the accurate CN before initiating mega projects involving rainfall-runoff simulations. Even a small error in CN value may lead to serious consequences. In the current study, the sensitivity analysis challenges the strength of the results of a model in the presence of ambiguity regarding CN value.
Keywords
References
Abdulkareem, Jabir Haruna, Biswajeet Pradhan, Wan nor Azmin Sulaiman, and nor Rohaizah Jamil. “Development of Lag Time and Time of Concentration for a Tropical Complex Catchment under the Influence of Long-Term Land Use/land Cover (LULC) Changes.” Arabian Journal of Geosciences 12, no. 3 (February 2019). doi:10.1007/s12517-019-4253-z.
Horton, Robert E. “The Rôle of Infiltration in the Hydrologic Cycle.” Transactions, American Geophysical Union 14, no. 1 (1933): 446. doi:10.1029/tr014i001p00446.
Homer, W.W. “The analysis of hydrologic data for small watersheds.” Tech. Paper 30, Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agri., Washington D.C., (1940): 30.
Mockus, V. "Estimation of total (peak rates of) surface runoff for individual storms, Exhibit A of Appendix B, Interim Survey Rep." Grand (Neosho) River Watershed, USDA, Washington, DC (1949).
Sherman, L.K. “The unit hydrograph method”. In: O.E. Meinzer (ed.) Physics of the Earth, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, N.Y., (1949): pp. 514–525.
Andrews, R. G. "The use of relative infiltration indices in computing runoff (unpublished)." Soil Conservation Service, Fort Worth, Texas, 6pp (1954).
Ogrosky, H. O. "Service objectives in the field of hydrology, (unpublished)." Soil Conservation Service, Lincoln, NE 5 (1956).
Cowan, W.L. (In: Rallison and Miller (1982), “Personal communications”, Letter to H.O. Ogrosky dated (Oct. 15, 1957): 7 pp.
Yusop, Z., C.H. Chan, and A. Katimon. “Runoff Characteristics and Application of HEC-HMS for Modelling Stormflow Hydrograph in an Oil Palm Catchment.” Water Science and Technology 56, no. 8 (October 2007): 41–48. doi:10.2166/wst.2007.690.
Razi, M.A.M., J. Ariffin, W. Tahir, and N.A.M. Arish. “Flood Estimation Studies Using Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) for Johor River, Malaysia.” Journal of Applied Sciences 10, no. 11 (November 1, 2010): 930–939. doi:10.3923/jas.2010.930.939.
Knebl, M.R., Z.-L. Yang, K. Hutchison, and D.R. Maidment. “Regional Scale Flood Modeling Using NEXRAD Rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: a Case Study for the San Antonio River Basin Summer 2002 Storm Event.” Journal of Environmental Management 75, no. 4 (June 2005): 325–336. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.024.
Yener, M. K., A. U. Sorman, A. A. Sorman, A. Sensoy, and T. Gezgin. "Modeling studies with HEC-HMS and runoff scenarios in Yuvacik Basin, Turkiye." Int. Congr. River Basin Manage 4, no. 2007 (2007): 621-634.
Shieh, Chjeng-Lun, Yuh-Rong Guh, and Shi-Qin Wang. “The Application of Range of Variability Approach to the Assessment of a Check Dam on Riverine Habitat Alteration.” Environmental Geology 52, no. 3 (September 19, 2006): 427–435. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0470-3.
Hasan, Zorkeflee Abu, Nuramidah Hamidon, and Mohd Suffian. "Integrated river basin management (IRBM): hydrologic modelling using HEC-HMS for Sungai Kurau basin, Perak." In International conference on water resources (ICWR 2009). (2009): 1147-1152.
Verma, Arbind K., Madan K. Jha, and Rajesh K. Mahana. “Evaluation of HEC-HMS and WEPP for Simulating Watershed Runoff Using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System.” Paddy and Water Environment 8, no. 2 (December 3, 2009): 131–144. doi:10.1007/s10333-009-0192-8.
Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi, Robabeh Khodaparas, Ali Talebi, Mehdi Vafakhah, and Jamal Dashti. “Determination of the Ability of HEC-HMS Model Components in Rainfall-Run-Off Simulation.” Research Journal of Environmental Sciences 5, no. 10 (October 1, 2011): 790–797. doi:10.3923/rjes.2011.790.797.
Tassew, Bitew G., Mulugeta A. Belete, and K. Miegel. “Application of HEC-HMS Model for Flow Simulation in the Lake Tana Basin: The Case of Gilgel Abay Catchment, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia.” Hydrology 6, no. 1 (March 10, 2019): 21. doi:10.3390/hydrology6010021.
Hawkins, R. H., D. E. Woodward, and R. Jiang. "Investigation of the runoff curve number abstraction ratio." In USDA-NRCS hydraulic engineering workshop, Tucson, Arizona. 2001.
Naden, Pamela S. “Spatial Variability in Flood Estimation for Large Catchments: The Exploitation of Channel Network Structure.” Hydrological Sciences Journal 37, no. 1 (February 1992): 53–71. doi:10.1080/02626669209492561.
Billa, Lawal, Shattri Mansor, and Ahmad Rodzi Mahmud. “Spatial Information Technology in Flood Early Warning Systems: An Overview of Theory, Application and Latest Developments in Malaysia.” Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 13, no. 5 (December 2004): 356–363. doi:10.1108/09653560410568471.
Bahat, Yonatan, Tamir Grodek, Judith Lekach, and Efrat Morin. “Rainfall–runoff modeling in a Small Hyper-Arid Catchment.” Journal of Hydrology 373, no. 1–2 (June 2009): 204–217. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.026.
Mishra, Surendra Kumar, and Vijay P. Singh. “Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology.” Water Science and Technology Library (2003): 84-146. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0147-1.
Bisharat, M. “Indus Basin Drought (1999-2000) Impact on irrigated agriculture – A policy review in the preview of Mega Storages and Floods”. 2nd World Irrigation Forum 6-8 November 2016, Chiang Mai, Thailand. W.1.1.17.
Ou HH. “A Study on the Application of HEC-HMS Rainfall-Runoff Model”. Master’s thesis, (2001): National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, (2001).
Tassew, Bitew G., Mulugeta A. Belete, and K. Miegel. “Application of HEC-HMS Model for Flow Simulation in the Lake Tana Basin: The Case of Gilgel Abay Catchment, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia.” Hydrology 6, no. 1 (March 10, 2019): 21. doi:10.3390/hydrology6010021.
McCarthy, Gerald T. "The unit hydrograph and flood routing." In proceedings of Conference of North Atlantic Division, US Army Corps of Engineers, 1938, pp. 608-609. 1938.
Haan, C.T. “Statistical methods in hydrology”. Second Edition, Iowa State Oress, (2002): 496 p.
Cunderlik, J.M; Simonovic, S.P. “Calibration, verification, and sensitivity analysis of the HEC-HMS hydrologic model. CFCAS Project: Assessment of water Resources Risk and Vulnerability to changing climate conditions.” Project Report IV. (2004): 113 p.
Sabol, G.V. “Clark unit hydrograph and r-parameter estimation”. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, (1988): 114/1, 103-111.
Nelson, E. James, Christopher M. Smemoe, and Bing Zhao. “A GIS Approach to Watershed Modeling in Maricopa County, Arizona.” WRPMD’99 (June 3, 1999). doi:10.1061/40430(1999)155.
Straub, Timothy D., Charles S. Melching, and Kyle E. Kocher. Equations for estimating Clark unit-hydrograph parameters for small rural watersheds in Illinois. No. 4184. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, 2000.
Fleming, Matt, and Vincent Neary. "Continuous hydrologic modeling study with the hydrologic modeling system." Journal of hydrologic engineering 9, no. 3 (2004): 175-183. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:3(175).
USACE. “Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS”. Technical Reference Manual. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, (2000b): 149 p.
Breierova., L. and Choudhari, M. “An Introduction to Sensitivity”, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (MIT) System Dynamics in Education Project, revised version (October, 2001), D-4526-2, (1996): pp 41-106.
Ouédraogo, Wendso, James Raude, and John Gathenya. “Continuous Modeling of the Mkurumudzi River Catchment in Kenya Using the HEC-HMS Conceptual Model: Calibration, Validation, Model Performance Evaluation and Sensitivity Analysis.” Hydrology 5, no. 3 (August 14, 2018): 44. doi:10.3390/hydrology5030044.
Kousari, Mohammad Reza, Hossein Malekinezhad, Hossein Ahani, and Mohammad Amin Asadi Zarch. “Sensitivity Analysis and Impact Quantification of the Main Factors Affecting Peak Discharge in the SCS Curve Number Method: An Analysis of Iranian Watersheds.” Quaternary International 226, no. 1–2 (October 2010): 66–74. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2010.05.011.
DOI: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091445
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Abdul Ghani Soomro, Muhammad Munir Babbar, Anila Hameem Memon, Jewell Lund, Arshad Ashraf, Arjumand Zehra Zaidi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
