Risk-Deformed Regulation: What Went Wrong with NFPA 805

Raymond HV Gallucci

Abstract


National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 805 was incorporated into Title 10 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations to allow commercial nuclear plants to transition their existing, deterministic fire protection licensing bases to ones that are “performance-based and risk-informed.”  Both the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the commercial reactor industry championed this major leap forward in “risk-informed regulation.”  However, hidden behind all the “success” are compromises and manipulations that were necessary to make this “work,” as revealed in this article.  It is written by a former employee of the NRC (views do not nor ever did represent an official position), the first to receive a PhD on a thesis specifically related to fire probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in nuclear plants, and later hired in 2003 as the expert in fire PRA for the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR).  He participated in the NFPA-805 program from the start in 2005 until mid-2014.  The perspectives here cover that time period, with some extended time specific to issues that the interested reader can find detailed in “Risk-Deformed Regulation:  What Went Wrong with NFPA 805” http://vixra.org/pdf/  (access latest version of entry 1805.0403).

NFPA 805 will have been “successful” in that adopting plants are as safe as or safer than before, at a minimum having at least become more knowledgeable of potential safety weaknesses.  Plants that made effective changes will be safer than before, although “effective” conveys that some changes only may have “seemingly” reduced risk.  If such changes were prompted by questionable risk-reduction credits such as those cited later in this paper, then perhaps actual risk-reduction changes that could have been made were not.  At worst, the plant merely missed an opportunity to become “safer,” a consequence of the problems with “risk-deformed regulation.”


Keywords


Fire Protection; Probabilistic Risk; Nuclear Power; Regulation.

References


National Fire Protection Association. “Standard NFPA-805: Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants” (2001 Edition).

Gallucci, Raymond. “A Methodology for Evaluating the Probability for Fire Loss of Nuclear Power Plant Safety Functions” (Doctoral Thesis). Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY (1980).

Gallucci, R., and R. Hockenbury. “Fire-Induced Loss of Nuclear Power Plant Safety Functions.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 64, no. 1 (March 1981): 135–147. doi:10.1016/0029-5493(81)90039-x.

Gallucci, Raymond. “Risk-Deformed Regulation: What Went Wrong with NFPA 805.” http://vixra.org/pdf/ (access latest version of entry 1805.0403), 2018.

USNRC. “Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.205: Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection for Existing Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants” (December 2009, Rev. 1).

USNRC. “RG 1.174: An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis” (May 2011, Rev. 2; January 2018, Rev. 3).

USNRC. “SECY-97-287: Final Regulatory Guidance on Risk-Informed Regulation Policy Issues” (December 12, 1997).

Gallucci, Raymond. “Measuring at-Transition Delta-Risk for Plant Change Evaluations (as Presented at March 2006 Observation Visit).” ADAMS Accession No. ML14108A062 (2006).

USNRC and EPRI. NUREG/CR-6850 (EPRI 1011989), “Fire PRA Methodology for Nuclear Power Facilities” (2005), with Supplements.

EPRI. “Report 1016735: Fire PRA Methods Enhancements” (December 2008).

USNRC. “Close-out of National Fire Protection Association 805 Frequently Asked Question 08-0046 on Incipient Fire Detection Systems.” ADAMS Accession No. ML090300496 (March 2009).

Gallucci, Raymond, et al. “Credit for Very Early Warning Fire Detection (VEWFD) in Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment.” Proceedings of Risk Management - for Tomorrow's Challenges, American Nuclear Society, 2011, LaGrange Park, Illinois, pp. 152-166.

USNRC. “NG-13-0182: Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805, Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants.” ADAMS Accession No. ML1322A045 (May 1, 2013).

USNRC. “NUREG-2180: Determining the Effectiveness, Limitations, and Operator Response for VEWFD Systems in Nuclear Facilities (DELORES-VEWFIRES)” (December 2016).

USNRC. “Official Transcripts of Proceedings, NRC: ACRS Reliability and PRA Subcommittee Meeting.” ADAMS Accession No. ML110050249 (December 13, 2010).

Baranowsky, Patrick. “Fire Ignition Frequency Estimation Using Recent Fire Events Data.” ANS PSA 2013 International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, 2013, Columbia, South Carolina, September 22-27, 2013.

USNRC and EPRI. “NUREG-2169 (EPRI 3002002936): Nuclear Power Plant Fire Ignition Frequency and Non-Suppression Probability Estimation Using the Updated Fire Events Database” (October 2014).

USNRC. “Duane Arnold Energy Center - Issuance of Amendment Regarding Transition to A Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection Program in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.48(c).” ADAMS Accession No. ML13210A449 (September 10, 2013).

USNRC. “Transmittal of NEI Report ‘Roadmap for Attaining Realism in Fire PRAs - December 2010’.” ADAMS Accession No. ML103430372 (December 6, 2010).

Chapman, James. “Seeking Realism in Fire PRA,” Scientech. ANS PSA 2013 International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, Columbia, South Carolina, September 22-27, 2013.

Gallucci, Raymond. “Predicting Fire-Induced Core Damage Frequencies - A Simple ‘Sanity Check’.” Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 94, Reno, Nevada, pp. 202-204 (2006).

Gallucci, Raymond. “How Immature and Overly Conservative is Fire PRA? - A Comparison of Early vs. Contemporary Fire PRAs and Methods.” American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment, PSA 2011, Wilmington, North Carolina (2011).

Gallucci, Raymond. “‘What-Me Worry?’1‘Why So Serious?’:2 A Personal View on the Fukushima Nuclear Reactor Accidents.” Risk Analysis 32, no. 9 (March 6, 2012): 1444–1450. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01780.x.

True, Douglas, et al. “Risk Informed Decision-making: Addressing Very Large PRA Uncertainties.” Plenary speech at International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, PSA 2013, Columbia, South Carolina, September 22-27, 2013.

Pietrangelo, Anthony (NEI). “Letter to A. MacFarlane (USNRC): Industry Support and Use of PRA and Risk-Informed Regulation” (December 19, 2013).

USNRC. “Draft Safety Evaluation for Oconee Nuclear Station Units 1, 2 and 3, Transition to a Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection Program in Accordance with Title 10, ‘Energy,’ of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Subpart 48(c).” ADAMS Accession No. ML103000047 (November 9, 2010).

USNRC. “Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3, Issuance of Amendments Regarding Transition to a Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection Program in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.48[c].” ADAMS Accession No. ML103630612 (December 29, 2010).

USNRC. “Notice of Violation and Confirmatory Order Related to a Fire Protection Program License Condition (Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3).” ADAMS Accession No. ML13114A928 (July 1, 2013).

Federal Register. “NRC Enforcement Policy: Extension of Discretion Period of Interim Enforcement Policy.” FR 52705 (September 10, 2008).

Gallucci, Raymond. “Enforcement Discretion Matrix (Scrubbed).” ADAMS Accession No. ML14108A072 (April 18, 2014).

ASME and ANS. “ASME/ANS RA-Sa-2009, Addenda to ASME/ANS RA-S-2008, Standard for Level 1/Large Early Release Frequency PRA for Nuclear Power Plant Applications” (2009).

NEI. “NEI-07-12: Fire PRA Peer Review Process Guidelines, Rev. 1” (June 2010).

Giitter, Joseph (NRC). “Letter to B. Bradley (NEI): Recent Fire PRA Methods Review Panel Decisions: Clarification for Transient Fires and Alignment Factor for Pump Oil Fires.” ADAMS Accession No. ML113130446 (September 27, 2011).

Giitter, Joseph (NRC). “Letter to B. Bradley (NEI): Recent Fire PRA Methods Review Panel Decisions and EPRI1022993, ‘Evaluation of Peak Heat Release Rates in Electrical Cabinet Fires’.” ADAMS Accession No. ML12171A583 (June 21, 2012).

Southern Company and Constellation Energy. “Reclaiming the Promise of Risk-Informed Decision-making: Obstacles and Opportunities.” Presented to the NRC, September 16, 2013.

NEI NSAIC. “Industry PRA Vision and Plan.” Presented to the NRC, October 17, 2013.

USNRC. “Close-out of Fire PRA FAQ 14-0009 on Treatment of Well-Sealed MCC Electrical Panels Greater than 440V.” ADAMS Accession No. ML15114A441 (April 29, 2015).

Hunt, Sean. “Maximum Fire Size in Closed Vent Electrical Panels,” Kleinsorg Group. Presented at the NEI Fire Protection Information Forum, September 22, 2009.

EPRI. “Report 1003326: Characterization of Fire-Induced Circuit Faults: Results of Cable Fire Testing” (December 2002).

USNRC. “Information Notice 2005-07 – Results of HEMYC® Electrical Raceway Fire Barrier System Full Scale Testing.” ADAMS Accession No. ML050890089 (March 30, 2005).

USNRC. “NUREG/CR-7197: Heat Release Rates of Electrical Enclosure Fires (HELEN-FIRE), Final Report” (April 2016).

Gallucci, Raymond. “How ‘Fuzzy’ Are the RG 1.174 CDF and LERF Regional Change Threshold Values?” ADAMS Accession No. ML14108A041 (April 18, 2014).

USNRC. “Notification of the Potential Existence of Defects Pursuant to 10 CFR Part 21.” ADAMS Accession No. ML13211A168 (July 26, 2013).

USNRC. “Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Issuance of Amendments Issuance Regarding Transition to a Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection Program in Accordance with 10CFR50.48[c].” ADAMS Accession No. ML13140A398 (October 24, 2013).

Combustion Engineering. “Final Safety Evaluation for PWR Owners Group Topical Report WCAP-16175-P, Revision 0 (CE NPSD-1199, Revision 1), ‘Model for Failure of RCP Seals Given Loss of Seal Cooling in CE NSSS Plants’” February 12, 2007.

Westinghouse Electric Co. “LTR-NRC-13-52: Notification of the Potential Existence of Defects Pursuant to 10 CFR Part 21” (July 26, 2013).

USNRC. “Summary of October 25, 2013, Category 2 Public Meeting Workshop with the Nuclear Energy Institute and Stakeholders to Discuss the National Fire Protection Association Standard 805.” ADAMS Accession No. ML13297A467 (October 24, 2013).

Gallucci, Raymond H. V. “Thirty-Three Years of Regulating Fire Protection at Commercial U.S. Nuclear Power Plants: Dousing the Flames of Controversy**.” Fire Technology 45, no. 4 (May 1, 2008): 355–380. doi:10.1007/s10694-008-0052-x.

Gallucci, Raymond. “Delta-Risk Calculations for NFPA-805 Transition (FAQ).” ADAMS Accession No. ML14108A051 (April 18, 2014).


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/cej-03091205

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Raymond HV Gallucci

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message